The table shows data about what people in the UK thought the government should increase spending on.
The given table illustrates the information about what people in the UK thought the government should spend more money on in 3 categories: health, education and other areas.
Overall, it can be seen that the vast majority of males and females believe that the state budget should be increasingly spent on education and health. In addition, while most young people paid attention to education, old generations focused more on health.
In terms of gender, more than half of men think the government should allocate more money towards education, whereas only 32% was spent on health. Meanwhile, the expense for health of women was 48%, which was a higher percentage than males, about 16% and only-fifths was concentrated on education. The expense for other areas was 13% and 12% according to males and females’s oppinion.
In terms of age group, more than half of citizens in the UK from 35 to 65 years of age had an idea that the government should spend more money on health than on education. On the other hand, a large number of young generations demanded using money on education and the expenditure for other areas received different opinions from various age groups.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 192, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...h than on education. On the other hand, a large number of young generations demanded using money ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, whereas, while, in addition, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 1.00243902439 499% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 3.97073170732 327% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 986.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 197.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00507614213 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74642080493 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67545919203 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.53807106599 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 296.1 283.868780488 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.4032790172 43.030603864 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.25 112.824112599 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.625 22.9334400587 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.25 5.23603664747 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.20271686818 0.215688989381 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0956810208104 0.103423049105 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.133390519296 0.0843802449381 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.162759787794 0.15604864568 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.157377759478 0.0819641961636 192% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.79 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.