The table shows the expenditure on various types of food in one European country in 1992, 2002 and 2012.
The amount spent on various foodstuffs in Italy (millions of euros)
1992 2002 2012
Beef 45 43 54
Chicken 38 41 56
Butter/margarine 8 9 8
Potatoes 11 14 18
Coffee 9 7 7
Milk 13 10 14
The chart compares and contrasts the data on the changes in the quantity of money which the Italian used for eating 6 kinds of food over three years (1992, 2002 and 2012). Generally, there was an upward trend in 4 categories including beef, chicken, potatoes and milk, whereas coffee witnessed a downward one.
it is clear that the expenditures on chicken and potatoes experienced a significant increase during the two decades, it rose by 18 and 7 millions of euros, respectively. Besides, although the amount spent on beef reached a nadir at 41 millions of euros in 2002, the trend still grew to 54 millions of euros in 2012. Moreover, a remarkable fluctuation was recorded in the Italian spending on milk, reducing to 10 millions of euros in 2002 and climbing by 4 millions of euros at the end of the period.
On the other hand, only the figure for coffee decreased by 2 millions of euros from 1992 to 2002 and then it stabilized at 7 millions of euros for the next 10 years. Meanwhile, the money spending on butter/margarine remained unchanged at 8 millions of euros although it also had a marginal increase in 2002.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...eas coffee witnessed a downward one. it is clear that the expenditures on chick...
^^
Line 3, column 136, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '7 million'.
Suggestion: 7 million
...ring the two decades, it rose by 18 and 7 millions of euros, respectively. Besides, although ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 233, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '41 million'.
Suggestion: 41 million
...amount spent on beef reached a nadir at 41 millions of euros in 2002, the trend still grew to ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 287, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '54 million'.
Suggestion: 54 million
... euros in 2002, the trend still grew to 54 millions of euros in 2012. Moreover, a remarkable f...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 410, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '10 million'.
Suggestion: 10 million
...e Italian spending on milk, reducing to 10 millions of euros in 2002 and climbing by 4 million...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 455, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '4 million'.
Suggestion: 4 million
...llions of euros in 2002 and climbing by 4 millions of euros at the end of the period. On...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 501, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ions of euros at the end of the period. On the other hand, only the figure for c...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 60, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '2 million'.
Suggestion: 2 million
...only the figure for coffee decreased by 2 millions of euros from 1992 to 2002 and then it sta...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 124, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '7 million'.
Suggestion: 7 million
... 1992 to 2002 and then it stabilized at 7 millions of euros for the next 10 years. Meanwhile,...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 239, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '8 million'.
Suggestion: 8 million
... butter/margarine remained unchanged at 8 millions of euros although it also had a marginal i...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, if, moreover, so, still, then, whereas, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 927.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 197.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.70558375635 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74642080493 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81393227478 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.558375634518 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 268.2 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 16.0966468811 43.030603864 37% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 132.428571429 112.824112599 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.1428571429 22.9334400587 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.0 5.23603664747 229% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 10.0 1.69756097561 589% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.228032140768 0.215688989381 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106261121191 0.103423049105 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0563242604693 0.0843802449381 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149758243164 0.15604864568 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.046546231476 0.0819641961636 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.2329268293 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.98 61.2550243902 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.8 10.3012195122 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.33 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.39 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.