The table provides statistics about millions of hectares of forested land in various regions of the world reported in 1990, 2000 and 2005.
Overall, Europe and Oceania possessed the highest and lowest amount of forested land compared to other places. Besides, the number of forest areas in every region witnessed a decrease or fluctuation except for an increase in the number of Europe's forests.
From 1990 to 2005, the number of forested land in Africa, South America, North America and Oceania was all down. Specifically, Africa owned 749 million hectares of forest in 1990 but only 691 million in 2005. The figure for North and South America dropped from 708 and 946 million to 705 and 882 million respectively. Similarly, Oceania's figure slightly dwindled from 199 to 197 million in 15 years.
In terms of forest area in Asia and Europe, there was an oscillation in Asia and a rise in Europe. In 1990, Asia owned 576 million hectares of forest, in the next decade, the number declined to 6 million but increase to 14 million hectares in 2005. In Europe, starting with 989 million, the figure surged to 1001 million in the fifteen years, which fivefold Oceania's figure.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 250, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ncrease to 14 million hectares in 2005. In Europe, starting with 989 million, the ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, if, similarly, so, except for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 977.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 199.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90954773869 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75589349951 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46085486601 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.537688442211 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 289.8 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 21.3166601512 43.030603864 50% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 97.7 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9 22.9334400587 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.3 5.23603664747 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.203469296192 0.215688989381 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0931211179294 0.103423049105 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0728127866148 0.0843802449381 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146432601216 0.15604864568 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.07343656797 0.0819641961636 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.47 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.