The table shows forested land in millions of hectares in different parts of the world.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The table compares the amounts of forested areas in six regions of the world in the years 1990, 2000, and 2005.
Overall, there was a drop in the numbers of areas covered by forests, except for Europe and Asia. It is noticeable that Europe had more forest covering areas than any other countries, while Oceania had the lowest figures for forested areas.
Between 1990 and 2005, forest area in Europe rose from 989 million to 1001 million ha, having the highest figures for wood zones of all the parts shown. A rising trend was also seen in Asia, from 576 million to 584 million hectares in 2005. There was a slight decrease in the figures for North America, falling by 3 million from 708 million in 1990.
By contrast, South America, which had the third-highest number for wood regions in 1990, at 946 million, saw a significant drop to 882 million in 2005. The reduction of forested area could also be seen in Africa, standing at 691 million by 2005, after decreasing by nearly 60 million hectares.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, third, while, except for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 828.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 177.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.67796610169 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64748333727 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.29852561869 2.65546596893 87% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.576271186441 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 234.0 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 24.1036174671 43.030603864 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 103.5 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.125 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.75 5.23603664747 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.138141006247 0.215688989381 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0711807627473 0.103423049105 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0349292406031 0.0843802449381 41% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0908110217757 0.15604864568 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0342763332588 0.0819641961636 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 74.53 61.2550243902 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.86 11.4140731707 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.94 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.