The table shows the number of international tourist arrivals (in thousands) in various countries in 2009 and 2010, together with the percentage change in these numbers.
The data of foreign tourists visiting in nine distinctive nations alongside the additional percentage figure for change are depicted in the table.
From a prospective outlook, the number of tourist arrivals in France came first. Apparently, most countries witnessed an upward trend in the figure for international guests meanwhile the contradictory movement was recorded in terms of Hong Kong.
From a quick glance at the table, the statistics of France remained constant from 2009 to 2010, yet, still occupied the first place with nearly 10 thousand tourists more than that of the USA. America, Spain and Italy simultaneously encountered an increase of a thousand arrivals with respectively 1,5%, 1,8% and 2,3%. Last but not least, the climbing rate of the United Kingdom was minimally higher with 2 thousand and nearly 4% in terms of transference.
Moving on to analyse the remaining part of the table, the statistics of Turkey in 2009 was 32 thousand visitors which surged to 46 thousand, a thousand more than that of Italy, with a massive 33% of change. The figure for China followed the same pattern but much more tremendous in pace. The most dramatic upward trend was allocated with Germany due to its two-fold increase. Contradistinctively, the visitor arrivals data of Hong Kong declined slightly by one thousand over the given period
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, but, first, look, still, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1130.0 965.302439024 117% => OK
No of words: 218.0 196.424390244 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18348623853 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84250218741 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9220003456 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 133.0 106.607317073 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.610091743119 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 341.1 283.868780488 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.33902439024 207% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.3721606718 43.030603864 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.0 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.2 5.23603664747 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.248332984724 0.215688989381 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0872858962918 0.103423049105 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0504505361036 0.0843802449381 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135482950508 0.15604864568 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0284842656485 0.0819641961636 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.2329268293 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 61.2550243902 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.17 8.06136585366 114% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 40.7170731707 152% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.