The table shows the number of mobile phones sold in millions for a period of 6 years

Essay topics:

The table shows the number of mobile phones sold in millions for a period of 6 years.

The table provides information about the sold phone numbers in millions from various companies including Nokia, Ericson, Samsung, Motorola and Apple from 2006 to 2012.

Overall, Apple company did not manufacture anything in 2006.Moreover,the amount of sold Nokia phones was significantly higher than other companies during first five , but it was no longer popular among people in 2012 ,and the most sold phone in 2012 accounted for Samsung. Also, Apple and Samsung companies experienced an upward trend , while rest of them had a downward trend.

To begin with, Samsung reached from 117 to 396.5 millions which had been doubled during the specific years ,whereas Apple company had a noticeably increase . it started at 2.3 millions in 2007 , and ended at 135.8 millions in 2012 which is over 50 times compared to 2006.

Regarding the other companies , Motorola and Ericson followed a same trend , starting at 210 and 74 and reached at 28 both ,respectively.in addition ,the amount of sold Nokia phones was 345 in 2006 , fluctuated over the years and remained at 335 in 2012.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 121, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ious companies including Nokia, Ericson, Samsung, Motorola and Apple from 2006 to...
^^
Line 3, column 61, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Moreover
...ny did not manufacture anything in 2006.Moreover,the amount of sold Nokia phones was sig...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 69, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , the
...ot manufacture anything in 2006.Moreover,the amount of sold Nokia phones was signifi...
^^^^
Line 3, column 165, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...r than other companies during first five , but it was no longer popular among peop...
^^
Line 3, column 217, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...s no longer popular among people in 2012 ,and the most sold phone in 2012 accounte...
^^
Line 3, column 297, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ted for Samsung. Also, Apple and Samsung companies experienced an upward trend , ...
^^
Line 3, column 336, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...g companies experienced an upward trend , while rest of them had a downward trend...
^^
Line 5, column 107, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...d been doubled during the specific years ,whereas Apple company had a noticeably i...
^^
Line 5, column 135, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('noticeably') instead an adjective, or a noun ('increase') instead of another adjective.
...ecific years ,whereas Apple company had a noticeably increase . it started at 2.3 millions in 2007 , ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 156, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... Apple company had a noticeably increase . it started at 2.3 millions in 2007 , an...
^^
Line 5, column 159, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...ple company had a noticeably increase . it started at 2.3 millions in 2007 , and e...
^^
Line 5, column 193, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ase . it started at 2.3 millions in 2007 , and ended at 135.8 millions in 2012 whi...
^^
Line 7, column 30, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...o 2006. Regarding the other companies , Motorola and Ericson followed a same tr...
^^
Line 7, column 75, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...torola and Ericson followed a same trend , starting at 210 and 74 and reached at 2...
^^
Line 7, column 123, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ing at 210 and 74 and reached at 28 both ,respectively.in addition ,the amount of ...
^^
Line 7, column 149, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...hed at 28 both ,respectively.in addition ,the amount of sold Nokia phones was 345...
^^
Line 7, column 164, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...,respectively.in addition ,the amount of sold Nokia phones was 345 in 2006 , fluc...
^^
Line 7, column 199, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...nt of sold Nokia phones was 345 in 2006 , fluctuated over the years and remained ...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, moreover, regarding, so, whereas, while, in addition, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 905.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 175.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.17142857143 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63713576256 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76856022756 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.634285714286 0.547539520022 116% => OK
syllable_count: 252.0 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 64.3678663793 43.030603864 150% => OK
Chars per sentence: 150.833333333 112.824112599 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.1666666667 22.9334400587 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 14.8333333333 5.23603664747 283% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 18.0 1.69756097561 1060% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.192374394695 0.215688989381 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0961598027516 0.103423049105 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0636156553535 0.0843802449381 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125409770401 0.15604864568 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0488434712809 0.0819641961636 60% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.5 13.2329268293 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.96 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.2 10.3012195122 118% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.3 11.4140731707 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.14 8.06136585366 113% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.