Given table provides the statistics of mobile sales, in millions from 2006 to 2012. At first a glance we can observe that Nokia domintend all over the period until it was overtook by Samsung.
Firstly, when considering Nokia, which was the top brand in 2006, accounted 345 million units sale that year. Following years it stood above 400 millions, but ended with a value lower to the initial amount.
Secondly, have a look at Samsung, which experienced an exponential growth throughout the period and exeeded Nokia at the end. On the other hand, Apple which was not in the seen in 2006, started sales in 2007, witnessed a gradual increase and reached a fairly good sales, at last.
Motorola was one of the leading brand in 2006, while it faced a sharp fall in consecutive years and plunged to 28 millions. Ericsson was another company, experienced same as that of Motorola.
Overall, Samsung and Apple showed a positive trend on the flip side Ericsson and Motorola lost in sales, at the same time Nokia witnessed a reduction in sale.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Given table provides the statistics of m...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 184, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'overtaken'.
Suggestion: overtaken
...intend all over the period until it was overtook by Samsung. Firstly, when c...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...riod until it was overtook by Samsung. Firstly, when considering Nokia, which w...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...h a value lower to the initial amount. Secondly, have a look at Samsung, which ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... reached a fairly good sales, at last. Motorola was one of the leading brand in...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... experienced same as that of Motorola. Overall, Samsung and Apple showed a posi...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, look, second, secondly, so, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 859.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 179.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.79888268156 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65774358864 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4780425208 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.648044692737 0.547539520022 118% => OK
syllable_count: 260.1 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.33902439024 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.3318082378 43.030603864 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.4444444444 112.824112599 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8888888889 22.9334400587 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.11111111111 5.23603664747 155% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 6.0 1.69756097561 353% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0528552989296 0.215688989381 25% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0254654789844 0.103423049105 25% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.035194385381 0.0843802449381 42% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0321648703626 0.15604864568 21% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0334537133445 0.0819641961636 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.2329268293 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.56 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.17 8.06136585366 114% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 40.7170731707 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.