The table shows the tourist numbers and tourist spending in five countries in 2012 and 2013. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The table compares the number and expenditure of tourists in five countries in 2012 and 2013. The information can be grouped into Europe and Non-Europe zone. It is obvious from the data that the expenditure from tourists in each countries in 2013 was higher than in 2012.
To begin with Europe zone, it consists of France, Spain and Italy. There were an increase in both tourists number and tourists spending in all of them. The number of tourists and tourists expenditure of Italy was the lowest in all countries both in 2012 and 2013. Spain saw a significant growth in number of tourists from 57.5 to 60.7 millions which was the most increasing rate from five countries and a moderate increase in tourists expenditure from 56.3 to 60.4 billion dollars and Spain was still the highest in both of them in Europe zone.
Moving on to Non-Europe zone, the tourists number and expenditure of USA went up dramatically by 3.1 to 69.8 millions and 13.4 to 139.6 billion dollars respectively and USA was the highest in the number of tourists and tourists spending from all countries. China is the only country which has less the number of tourists in 2013 than in 2012. The tourists number decreased from 57.7 to 55.7 millions but there was an increase in tourists expenditure between 50 and 51.7 billion dollars.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 99, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'tourists'' or 'tourist's'?
Suggestion: tourists'; tourist's
...d Italy. There were an increase in both tourists number and tourists spending in all of ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 35, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'tourists'' or 'tourist's'?
Suggestion: tourists'; tourist's
...e. Moving on to Non-Europe zone, the tourists number and expenditure of USA went up d...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, still, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 6.8 221% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 33.7804878049 139% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1086.0 965.302439024 113% => OK
No of words: 226.0 196.424390244 115% => OK
Chars per words: 4.80530973451 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87727950738 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58316143534 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 106.607317073 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.424778761062 0.547539520022 78% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 307.8 283.868780488 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 72.9975342049 43.030603864 170% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.6 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.9 5.23603664747 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.319806989381 0.215688989381 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.185325628851 0.103423049105 179% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.117765439542 0.0843802449381 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.265934438836 0.15604864568 170% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0235937660754 0.0819641961636 29% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.96 8.06136585366 86% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.