The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

Essay topics:

The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade*-labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The provided two tables illustrate the changes in the sales of Fairtrade labelled coffee and bananas in five distinct European nations. The survey was conducted in the period from 1999 to 2004.
As far as the charts, the sales of coffee in the UK dominated over the rest, while the first rank about the buy of Fairtrade labelled bananas belonged to Switzerland.
For the sales of coffee, the year 2004 witnessed a dramatic growth from 1.5 to 2004 (million euros) in the UK, whereas this figure of Sweden progressed slowly, just at 1 compared to 0.8 (million euros) in 1999. In Switzerland, sales increase twofold and reached 6 (million euros) in 2004. Finally, there was a slight rise in Denmark and Belgium, with 1.8-2 and 1-1.7 (million euros) respectively.
In regard to bananas, the sales in Switzerland rocketed to 47 (million euros) across five years, while in the UK and Belgium sales only grew from 1-5.5 and from 0.6-4 (million euros). Sweden and Denmark showed a different tendency, both of them fell nearly a half compared to original, at 1 and 0.9 (million euros) in 2004.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, if, whereas, while, in regard to

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 888.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 186.0 196.424390244 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.77419354839 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69299088775 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49473952271 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.548387096774 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 254.7 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.0572575164 43.030603864 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.0 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.25 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.23603664747 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.180131800863 0.215688989381 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0928224510109 0.103423049105 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0786968524633 0.0843802449381 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140158982387 0.15604864568 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0837648382737 0.0819641961636 102% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.2329268293 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.