The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade labelled coffeee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries.
The two tables provide information about sales of Fairtrade-labelled coffee and bananas in five European countries of two years: 1999 and 2004. In general, over the gap of 5 years from 1999 and 2004, the sales of both the products increased.
More specifically, the sales of coffee in UK increased from 1.5 millions to 20 millions, and this is the highest amount of coffee sales among the five European countries. Whereas, the lowest amount of sales increased occurred in Sweden from .8 millions to 1 millions. Furthermore, Switzerland was the most dominant country of bananas sales where it increased from 15 millions to 47 millions. Additionally, of all the sales of both coffee and bananas, only in two instances, it decreased from 1999 to 2004, it was in Sweden and Denmark, in banana department.
Interestingly, coffee and bananas sales in Sweden were identical in 2004 which was 1 million. Moreover, the sales of Denmark had a somewhat peculiar pattern, as coffee sales were 2 millions in 2004 and bananas sales were also 2 millions in 1999.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 172, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ales among the five European countries. Whereas, the lowest amount of sales increased o...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 247, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nas sales were also 2 millions in 1999.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, if, moreover, so, whereas, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 880.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 176.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64232057368 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95557237398 2.65546596893 111% => OK
Unique words: 87.0 106.607317073 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.494318181818 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 254.7 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.7856928743 43.030603864 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.0 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.23603664747 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.344566056049 0.215688989381 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.177905858888 0.103423049105 172% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.147912223647 0.0843802449381 175% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.284607285051 0.15604864568 182% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.150927778206 0.0819641961636 184% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.2329268293 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.72 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.23 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.