The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade-labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The tables compare the selling of coffee and bananas with the Fairtrade label in the years 1999 and 2004 in five countries in Europe.
It is clear that the sales of coffee and bananas rose in five countries in the 5-years period. The UK had significantly more than any of the others in all two selling categories. In contrast, Sweden and Denmark numbers for banana sales dropped in 2004.
The UK’s figures in coffee and banana sales are the highest, with 20 and 47 million euros in 2004, after increasing dramatically from 1.5 and 15 million in 1999 respectively. Switzerland’s number for coffee sales doubled to 6 million in 2004 and the sales of bananas also saw a fivefold increase, with 5.5 million. Belgium had 1.7 million for coffee sales and 4 million for the selling of bananas in 2004.
Danish revenue was 1.8 million for selling coffee in 1999, slowly rose to 2 million in 2004. But the income for bananas was rather small, 2 million in 1999 and fell by 0.9 in 2004. Downward trends can be seen in Sweden’s number, also for banana sales, decreased by 0.8 million in 2004.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 900.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 193.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.66321243523 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72725689877 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50531931614 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.512953367876 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 252.0 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.6700179328 43.030603864 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.0 112.824112599 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.23603664747 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.21795882846 0.215688989381 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.12151614309 0.103423049105 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0793365555208 0.0843802449381 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.181094300699 0.15604864568 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0770667089318 0.0819641961636 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 13.2329268293 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 77.57 61.2550243902 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.75 11.4140731707 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.52 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.