The given tables provide insight into five European nations in terms of turnover of Fairtrade-labelled coffee and bananas during the period 1999 and 2004.
Overall, regarding coffee, all five nations experienced a significant increase from 1999 to 2004. And a similar trend was seen in the sales of bananas in three countries, barring Belgium and Sweden.
Looking at the tables in more detail, in 1999, in terms of coffee, Switzerland dominated the entire table, with 3 million euros, and in 2004, its figure increased twofold, to 6 million euros. Although in 1999, the sales of coffee in the UK were only 1.5 million euros, it experienced an upsurge in 2004, to 20 million euros and hold the first position. Moreover, in 1999, the coffee turnover in Denmark and Sweden were 1.8 and 0.8 million euros, in turn. During the period, there was a 0.2-million-euro increase in these two nations. In Belgium, a slight increase was witnessed, starting at 1 million euros in 1999, and ending at 1.7 million euros in 2004.
Turning to the sales of bananas, in 1999, the UK was the largest market, with 15 million euros, which was far higher than the total bananas turnover in the other nations and reached 47 million euros in the next five years. Furthermore, in the year 1999, Switzerland possessed 1 million euros of banana sales, which was only one-fifth of it in 2004, roughly 5.5 million euros. During the period, there was a moderate rise observed in Denmark, standing at 0.6 million euros in 1999 before rising to 4 million euros in 2004. In contrast, both Belgium and Sweden experienced a downward tendency, with 1 and 0.9 million euros in 2004, respectively.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, if, look, moreover, regarding, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 33.7804878049 160% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1379.0 965.302439024 143% => OK
No of words: 282.0 196.424390244 144% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.89007092199 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 3.73543355544 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69103146013 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 131.0 106.607317073 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.464539007092 0.547539520022 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 391.5 283.868780488 138% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 16.0 3.36585365854 475% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.2853536936 43.030603864 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.916666667 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.16666666667 5.23603664747 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.142403270334 0.215688989381 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0744876085337 0.103423049105 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0614215998279 0.0843802449381 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134733631163 0.15604864568 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0736820455341 0.0819641961636 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.38 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.36 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 40.7170731707 157% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.