The given tables compare and contrast data on the changes in revenue of five different European nations from selling two fairtrade-labeled products including bananas and coffee during a 5-year-period from 1999 to 2004.
Overall, as clearly shown in the tables, an upward trend can be seen in most of those goods, except for the figures for bananas in Denmark and Sweden during the given time frame. Furthermore, the UK earned the greatest income from bananas and coffee compared to any other mentioned countries in 2004.
As for the sales of coffee, it is evident that selling such product had brought in Switzerland the largest revenue with 3 million euros in the first year before this number doubled to 6 million the next five years. That said, although the figures for the UK in 1999 just was precisely a half of Switzerland’s, the revenue from the coffee of this nation took the lead position in 2004 after a tremendous boom to 20 million being recorded. In sharp contrast, sales from the coffee trade remained stable with the bottom position over the period despite seeing a rise, slight one from 0.8 million to 1 million. In 2004, the figures were 1.8 for Denmark and 1 million for Belgium, then increased minimally to 2 million and 1.7 million euros respectively at the end of the period.
Regarding bananas’ figures, it is apparent that the highest revenue market during the period belonged to Switzerland, sales reaching 47 million euros and more than three times higher than the figure for the beginning of the period in 2004. Sales from trading bananas in other countries were no more than 2 million in 1999, then that of UK and Belgium increased somewhat to 5.5 million and 4 million respectively while the figures for Sweden and Denmark went on an opposite direction, falling to around 1 million five years later.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, if, regarding, so, then, while, as for, except for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 54.0 33.7804878049 160% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1532.0 965.302439024 159% => OK
No of words: 312.0 196.424390244 159% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.91025641026 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20279927342 3.73543355544 113% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63900221218 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 106.607317073 156% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.532051282051 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 445.5 283.868780488 157% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 34.0 22.4926829268 151% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 47.1642781754 43.030603864 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 170.222222222 112.824112599 151% => OK
Words per sentence: 34.6666666667 22.9334400587 151% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.77777777778 5.23603664747 149% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.179613799827 0.215688989381 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0910583294499 0.103423049105 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0740079415446 0.0843802449381 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144873172912 0.15604864568 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0790517488193 0.0819641961636 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.0 13.2329268293 144% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.89 61.2550243902 88% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.3012195122 138% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.79 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.76 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 40.7170731707 167% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.6 10.9970731707 142% => OK
text_standard: 19.0 11.0658536585 172% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.