The table gives information about the underground systems in six major cities around the world in three categories, opening date, total length in km, and total number of passengers (in millions). Overall, London has the oldest and the longest metro network.
London underground was built in 1863, which is roughly 40 years before Paris underground. This was followed by Tokyo 1927, Washington DC 1976 and Kyoto 1981. Strikingly, Los Angeles met with underground almost 140 years later than London, in 2001.
Coming up to total length, London was again the in the leading position with 394 km. This was more than the sum of Paris and Tokyo, which were 199km for the former and 155 km for the latter one. Washington DC had a total route of 126 kilometers, although it was started to build quite later than the first three. Strikingly Kyoto and Los Angeles had only 11km and 28 km of underground respectively.
If we look at the passenger volume, Tokyo was the first one, with 1.9 billion people annually. This was followed by Paris with 1.1 billion and 775 million for London respectively. 144 million people travelled with underground in Washington DC. Finally roughly 50 million people used subway in Kyoto and Los Angeles.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...and 28 km of underground respectively. If we look at the passenger volume, Toky...
^^^
Line 7, column 245, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Finally,
...lled with underground in Washington DC. Finally roughly 50 million people used subway i...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 317, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e used subway in Kyoto and Los Angeles.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, if, look
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1026.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 207.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95652173913 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79308509922 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55985775236 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 106.607317073 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.594202898551 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 280.8 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.0201659739 43.030603864 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 78.9230769231 112.824112599 70% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.9230769231 22.9334400587 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.84615384615 5.23603664747 35% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.09268292683 244% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.10901854093 0.215688989381 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0385653359009 0.103423049105 37% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0680860905985 0.0843802449381 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0838023293229 0.15604864568 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0819762350001 0.0819641961636 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 13.2329268293 75% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.17 61.2550243902 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 11.19 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.81 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => Gunning_fog is low.
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to improve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.