Task 1: The diagrams show changes in a student common room
The two maps depict how a student common room has changed since the past five years to the present. Overall, the room experienced substantial developments, the most notable of which is the construction of more educational and entertainment facilities.
To the left of the entrance, a row of household appliances has unchanged in size and position while a bench has been transferred by a supplemental microwave. Additionally, an electric drinks machine was placed beside the refrigerator. Furthermore, an eight-seat rectangular table was installed in the place where was formerly occupied by one of two seven-piece round table where the others has remained throughout that time.
To the right of the entrance, one of two seven-piece round table which near the entrance has still conserved whereas the others was transferred and replaced by a four-seat non-backrest bench. Another significant development was that a newly flat television with three non-backrest armchair have been put in the back right corner where was initially held by a two drawer vertical cabinet.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 64, Rule ID: ADJECTIVE_IN_ATTRIBUTE[1]
Message: A more concise phrase may lose no meaning and sound more powerful.
Suggestion: unchanged
...ance, a row of household appliances has unchanged in size and position while a bench has been tra...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 368, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'table' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'tables'.
Suggestion: tables
...ccupied by one of two seven-piece round table where the others has remained throughou...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, still, whereas, while, as for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 906.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 167.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.4251497006 4.92477711251 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.59483629437 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.22344845743 2.65546596893 121% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.610778443114 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 276.3 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.6624342343 43.030603864 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.428571429 112.824112599 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8571428571 22.9334400587 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.57142857143 5.23603664747 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0785700251913 0.215688989381 36% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0468830493323 0.103423049105 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0939452195295 0.0843802449381 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0759751447747 0.15604864568 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.107445080144 0.0819641961636 131% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.2329268293 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 61.2550243902 65% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.3012195122 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.51 11.4140731707 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.5 8.06136585366 118% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.