Thr graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emission person in the United Kingdom Sweden Italy and Portugal between 1967 in 2007.

Essay topics:

Thr graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emission person in the United Kingdom Sweden Italy and Portugal between 1967 in 2007.

The line chart illustrates the average carbon dioxide emission through each person in the four different nations during 1967 to 2007.

Overall it can be seen that Italy and portugal discharge of co2 continuously increased all over the period, while two other countries United Kingdom and Sweden to decrease all over the period.

Looking at a graph in more detail,it is evident that the amount of United Kingdom carbon dioxide which was discharge 11 metric tonnes by person in 1967 and it continuous decrease 8.5 matric tonnes in 2007. Similarly, release of Sweden 8.5 matric tonnes co2 in the first year and picked up more than 10 metric tonnes in 1977, whereasa continuous decrease 25 metric tonnes in the last year.

Turning to the remaining two data sets,the amount of Italy which was emissioned more than four metric tonnes in the beginning year, by each person.Italy admission continuously increase to 7.5 metric tonnes in all over the period.similarly, co2 of Portugal escalated from one metric tons in 1967 25 metric tons in the final year.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 34, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , it
.... Looking at a graph in more detail,it is evident that the amount of United Ki...
^^^
Line 13, column 39, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , the
... Turning to the remaining two data sets,the amount of Italy which was emissioned mo...
^^^^
Line 13, column 148, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Italy
...s in the beginning year, by each person.Italy admission continuously increase to 7.5 ...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, look, similarly, so, whereas, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 888.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 175.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07428571429 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63713576256 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62390890832 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 93.0 106.607317073 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.531428571429 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 263.7 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 35.0 22.4926829268 156% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 64.7549225928 43.030603864 150% => OK
Chars per sentence: 177.6 112.824112599 157% => OK
Words per sentence: 35.0 22.9334400587 153% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.2 5.23603664747 176% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.262704564902 0.215688989381 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.160040140402 0.103423049105 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0777150223581 0.0843802449381 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.17224272579 0.15604864568 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.053910512105 0.0819641961636 66% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.9 13.2329268293 150% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.41 61.2550243902 73% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 10.3012195122 153% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.72 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.98 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.0 10.9970731707 145% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 11.0658536585 145% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.