The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by local authorities in Someland in 1980, 1990 and 2000.
The pie charts compare the differences in expenditures of the Government in Some Land in three years 1980, 1990, and 2000.
Overall, as can be seen, the proportion of spending on transportation and health & human resources experienced a dramatic fluctuation. A visible trend is that higher education accounted for the largest expenditure on some areas.
The government spent the percentage of their income on higher education in 1980 with 35%, and it reached the highest point in 1990 at 45%, compared with 40% in 2000. The rate of expenditure on K-12 education was 25% in 1980. The figure for 1990 and 2000 fell gradually, to 20% and 18% respectively. However, local authorities spent a significantly lower proportion on environmental services, which increased from 4% to 5% between 1980 and 1990, and there was a slight rise in 2000.
In terms of transportation, there was 6% of annual spending in 1980, in comparison with 6% of those in 1990 and 22% in 2000. Likewise, the period from 1980 to 1990 witnessed a small growth in health and human resources’expenditure, at 14% and 20% respectively. In 2000, the spending on health and human resources halved in comparison to 1990, at 10%.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d in three years 1980, 1990, and 2000. Overall, as can be seen, the proportion ...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 225, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ture on K-12 education was 25% in 1980. The figure for 1990 and 2000 fell gradually...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, likewise, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 998.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 199.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01507537688 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75589349951 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.40844539343 2.65546596893 128% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.537688442211 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 272.7 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.6669616508 43.030603864 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.8 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9 22.9334400587 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.5 5.23603664747 48% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.303405007152 0.215688989381 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.121743895977 0.103423049105 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0876141314853 0.0843802449381 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.182245380382 0.15604864568 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0947704254673 0.0819641961636 116% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.2329268293 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.83 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.