The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by local authorities in Someland in 1980, 1990 and 2000.
The presented pie charts depict information about changes in the shares six different government agencies which comprised the yearly expenses in Someland over the three separate years.
At first glance, it is immediately obvious that while the shares of three items experienced rises, there were declines in the remaining three. Moreover, higher education costs contributed the largest proportion of expenditure throughout the survey, whereas environmental services and other activities had the smallest share.
When observing data in more detail, money spend on higher education accounted for the most significant proportion of expenditure in 1980 with standing at 35% and went up by just under a half before declining slightly to the point of two-fifths. In comparison, the charges of K-12 education were responsible for a quarter of all expenses in 1980, but this share dipped substantially by 18% over the course of these 20 years.
The share of health and human resources was initially as high as that of transportation with standing at 14% and 16%, respectively, but while the former increased by a fifth before dropping double, the latter witnessed a marked rise after which it decreased, reaching 10%. The contribution of environmental services had increased minimally from 4% to 5% and reached 9% in 2000, however, the reverse trend was true for remained services which declined from 6% to 1%.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 158, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...expenditure in 1980 with standing at 35% and went up by just under a half before ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, moreover, so, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1199.0 965.302439024 124% => OK
No of words: 222.0 196.424390244 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.4009009009 4.92477711251 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8600083453 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98130146558 2.65546596893 112% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 106.607317073 136% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.653153153153 0.547539520022 119% => OK
syllable_count: 351.9 283.868780488 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 22.4926829268 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 40.9404744596 43.030603864 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 171.285714286 112.824112599 152% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.7142857143 22.9334400587 138% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.57142857143 5.23603664747 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.111404753151 0.215688989381 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0506138846157 0.103423049105 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0553690787906 0.0843802449381 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.07344271493 0.15604864568 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0593203279682 0.0819641961636 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.9 13.2329268293 150% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.01 61.2550243902 65% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 6.51609756098 200% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 10.3012195122 149% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.63 11.4140731707 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.87 8.06136585366 122% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 40.7170731707 162% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 11.4329268293 136% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.9970731707 131% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.