The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by local authorities in Someland in 1980, 1990 and 2000.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The pie charts compare patterns of the annual expenditure by Someland authorities in 1980, 1990 and 2000.
One prominent feature is that education, including higher and K-12 education, took up the lion's share in
any given year, accounting for almost three quarters of the total spending. K-12 education expense
decreased by seven percent from 25% in 1980 to 18% in 2000. The proportion of higher education
spending rose significantly, from a third of the total expense in 1980 to nearly a half in 1990, before falling
to 40 percent by 2000.
The rest of the authorities' spending was divided between transportation, environmental services, health
and human resources and other expenses. Although the authorities increased their spending on health and
human resources from 14% in 1980 to 20% by 1990, they cut it by a half by 2000. A reversed pattern
applied to transportation spending, shrinking from 16 percent in 1980 to six percent in 1990 before
expanding to 22 percent in 2000. Just a modest share of the local budget was allocated for
environmental services, never exceeding a tenth of the authorities' total expenditure.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, third
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 966.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 184.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68302321012 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03406930698 2.65546596893 114% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.548913043478 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 267.3 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.2693636372 43.030603864 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.75 112.824112599 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.625 5.23603664747 31% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 12.0 3.83414634146 313% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.212840000173 0.215688989381 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107122756736 0.103423049105 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0945393257511 0.0843802449381 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0826881496371 0.15604864568 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0817783163089 0.0819641961636 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.2329268293 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.47 11.4140731707 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.55 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.