The three pie charts compare the changes in annual expenditure of a certain British school in 1991, 1981 and 2001.
On the one hand, It is noticeable that the school workers’ salary, which accounted for two thirds of the total spendings in 1981 and 1991. From these, teachers’ salaries were taking up about a half of the budget, whereas other workers’ salaries occupied about a quarter of it in 1981 and lower shares in the following years. On the other hand, the most striking feature that the insurance, which is the smallest proportion in the entire chart, had a stable growth being a 2% in 1981 and 8% in 2001.
Meanwhile, expenditures on furniture & equipment and resources were equal in 1981. However, in the following year, resources were one of the most considerable proportions in school spending in 1991, while in 2001, it was a bit smaller than one tenth. By contrast, furniture & equipment had a share of 23% in 2001, whereas it was a 5% in the previous decade.
Overall, the price of the insurance has experienced a stable growth, whereas others’ shares were fluctuating.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, so, third, whereas, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 918.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 186.0 196.424390244 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.93548387097 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69299088775 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77749231469 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.548387096774 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 256.5 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.488554493 43.030603864 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.75 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.25 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.625 5.23603664747 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.200656140482 0.215688989381 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.096314910696 0.103423049105 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.105326605891 0.0843802449381 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1426914565 0.15604864568 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.129420311622 0.0819641961636 158% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.2329268293 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.67 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.17 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.