The three pie charts conclude the information of how yearly government's expense changed in Someland, in three different time points--1980,1990 and 2000.
It is clearly that education( higher education and K-12 education) is account for over half numbers of all spending in 1980 and 1990. However, the situation have changed in 2000 that transportation has token the second place instead of K-12 education but higher education still remain the first.
The government is likely to fund more on education( higher education and K-12 education) as 60%, 65% in 1980 and 1990. In contrast, environmental services seems not to be taken much seriously which only account for 4% of all in 1980; shows an increasing trend after two decades finally end up to 9% in 2000.
In 2000, while spending dropped slightly to 58% on education( higher education and K-12 education) there was a corresponding rise in expenditure on transportation such as subway and aircraft to 22%. Health and human resources was once increased from 14% (1980) to 20%(1990), and eventually end up to 10% in 2000. The expenditure on other things keep decreased over all times.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 239, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...ly account for 4% of all in 1980; shows a increasing trend after two decades fina...
^
Line 7, column 61, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ing dropped slightly to 58% on education higher education and K-12 education ther...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, however, if, second, so, still, while, as to, in contrast, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 3.97073170732 403% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 952.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 186.0 196.424390244 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11827956989 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69299088775 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94921754851 2.65546596893 111% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.596774193548 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 264.6 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.445559171 43.030603864 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.0 112.824112599 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.25 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.875 5.23603664747 208% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.16734821674 0.215688989381 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0838345377703 0.103423049105 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0869345561933 0.0843802449381 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13444516351 0.15604864568 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0986203842227 0.0819641961636 120% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.2329268293 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.66 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.