The given pie chart illustrated the proportion of graduates who held various degrees in a given nation, between 1980 and 2008. It is typically manifest that the First-degree Arts and Science lost popularity whereas the Masters and Doctoral courses gained popularity after a period of nearly three decades.
To start with, in 1980, 13% of the graduates held a Ph.D. Science, whereas in 2008, this proportion significantly increased, that is it reached around 30%. Moreover, the Doctoral courses in Arts were increased slightly from 1980 to 2008, from 2% to 7% respectively. Similarly in Masters Arts, the graduate qualified also slight increase, from 12percent to 13 percent.
On the other hand, a quarter of the graduates held a First-degree in Arts, while only 19% went for First-degree in Science. But in 2008, this percentage was considerably declined that is 11% and 10% respectively. Furthermore, the figures for opting for the Master Science remain stable in both years.
Overall, it is conventionally seen that Ph.D. opting graduates increase. Also, Postgraduates were decreased. But it is interesting to see that Masters in Science pursued the same people.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 268, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Similarly,
...0 to 2008, from 2% to 7% respectively. Similarly in Masters Arts, the graduate qualified...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, moreover, similarly, so, whereas, while, to start with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 989.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 185.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.34594594595 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68801715136 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03438295413 2.65546596893 114% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.583783783784 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 277.2 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.1510698701 43.030603864 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.9090909091 112.824112599 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.8181818182 22.9334400587 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.81818181818 5.23603664747 188% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 3.70975609756 243% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0629429779216 0.215688989381 29% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0248727869149 0.103423049105 24% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.025623967658 0.0843802449381 30% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0375842275666 0.15604864568 24% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00728345561391 0.0819641961636 9% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.2329268293 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 61.2550243902 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.3012195122 82% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.45 11.4140731707 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.27 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.