The two figures below show the rate of criminal convictions among men and women of different ages in the UK and the proportion of male and female prison inmates in the British prison system.

Essay topics:

The two figures below show the rate of criminal convictions among men and women of different ages in the UK and the proportion of male and female prison inmates in the British prison system.

Given are the pie chart and the line graph illustrating the data of men and women who were convicted in various ages and the percentage of prisoner among female and male in the UK.

It is clear from the two figures that men who were in prison were dominant in the research time. Moreover, the male criminal were always higher than other gender in the UK.

In the British systems, the percentage of male prisoner was the most popular, at 96%. While the figure for women was received the least expenditure, at only 4%. There was a disproportion of prison inmates in gender.

For the 20-25 age group, the proportion of offender was the highest of both men and women, at 14% to 16% and 4% to 5% respectively. Men who were imprisoned in the 30-50 age group was higher than women at the same age, about 6 to 12%. By contrast, spending on this item between the 10-15 age group and 55-60 age group was the smallest between men and women, at only under 4% of the total spending.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 7, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'is'.
Suggestion: is
Given are the pie chart and the line graph illust...
^^^
Line 3, column 130, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...h time. Moreover, the male criminal were always higher than other gender in the U...
^^
Line 7, column 398, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...at only under 4% of the total spending.
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
moreover, so, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 799.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 180.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.43888888889 4.92477711251 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66284150148 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.38054745234 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.544444444444 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 243.9 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.0391783441 43.030603864 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.7777777778 112.824112599 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 22.9334400587 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.11111111111 5.23603664747 40% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 1.13902439024 615% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.32957705884 0.215688989381 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.143842931125 0.103423049105 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0670054816028 0.0843802449381 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.208057954897 0.15604864568 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0631747523429 0.0819641961636 77% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.5 13.2329268293 72% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.47 11.4140731707 74% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.87 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.