Two given maps illustrate the changes that took place on Melvin island from 2000 to 2010. As it is observed from the given illustration, many new facilities were constructed for the tourists including chalets, hotel, golf course, spa, restaurant and the airport, while three quarters of the forest was removed.
Before the hotel and chalets were built in the northwestern part of the island, there were only garages and a motel. Also, the trees in the northern part of the Melvin island were cut down and replaced by a golf-course and the farmland which was to the south from the aforementioned forest was replaced by a new spa centre with a swimming pool. In the southwestern part of the island tearooms were replaced with a seafood restaurant and in southeastern part the trees were cleared to make way for the airport. The Marina was developed on the shore to the south from the village.
In conclusion, it can be seen that Melvin was transformed between 2000 and 2010 and was made a tourist attraction.
Two given maps illustrate the changes that took place on Melvin island from 2000 to 2010. As it is observed from the given illustration, many new facilities were constructed for the tourists including chalets, hotel, golf course, spa, restaurant and the airport, while three quarters of the forest was removed.
Before the hotel and chalets were built in the northwestern part of the island, there were only garages and a motel. Also, the trees in the northern part of the Melvin island were cut down and replaced by a golf-course and the farmland which was to the south from the aforementioned forest was replaced by a new spa centre with a swimming pool. In the southwestern part of the island tearooms were replaced with a seafood restaurant and in southeastern part the trees were cleared to make way for the airport. The Marina was developed on the shore to the south from the village.
In conclusion, it can be seen that Melvin was transformed between 2000 and 2010 and was made a tourist attraction.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, so, while, as to, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 7.0 200% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 839.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 174.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.82183908046 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63192868298 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71676216674 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 106.607317073 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.551724137931 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 245.7 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.984867836 43.030603864 135% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.857142857 112.824112599 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8571428571 22.9334400587 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.28571428571 5.23603664747 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.50683833815 0.215688989381 235% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.232765215784 0.103423049105 225% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.204940345001 0.0843802449381 243% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.374014308956 0.15604864568 240% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.333655358198 0.0819641961636 407% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.37 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.