The maps illustrate the changes which have taken place on the island after development of some facilities for tourists.
Overall, before the renovation, the place was surrounded by tree and small beach without any tourist facilities, whereas many facilities have been constructed for tourists, including accommodation, restaurants and swimming facilities, and those have been built without affecting the natural resources.
Before the facilities were constructed, there was only sea and beach on the island. Other than that east and west side of the island had some trees, while rest of it was only an open space. On the other hand, after the Construction and development, the island became very useful with its infrastructure. Some accommodation facilities have been built in the middle of the land, whereas others have been located near the beach in the west.
Moreover, roads and footpaths have been built to facilitate tourists. The footpaths have been made to walk between residential areas and the beach, while motor tracks have been constructed to visit the restaurant, reception area and pier for boating. In addition to this, restaurant and reception area have been constructed between both accommodation area. Interestingly, no woodcutting took place as trees are present in both maps. Furthermore, a pier has been built for landing boat, while swimming facilities were available in west side of an island nearby the beach.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 553, Rule ID: NEAR_BY[1]
Message: Did you mean 'nearby'?
Suggestion: nearby
...ere available in west side of an island near by the beach.
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 572, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...st side of an island near by the beach.
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, moreover, so, whereas, while, in addition, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 7.0 214% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1221.0 965.302439024 126% => OK
No of words: 226.0 196.424390244 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.40265486726 4.92477711251 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87727950738 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93748328519 2.65546596893 111% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 106.607317073 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.544247787611 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 368.1 283.868780488 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 1.07073170732 560% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.1807549085 43.030603864 145% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.0 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5454545455 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.63636363636 5.23603664747 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.12307691955 0.215688989381 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0563445461166 0.103423049105 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0423410633293 0.0843802449381 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0958390406056 0.15604864568 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0358626825527 0.0819641961636 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.2329268293 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.04 11.4140731707 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.84 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.