The two maps below show an island, before and after the construction of some tourist facilities.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The given two Pictorial graph compare the island before and after the construction for tourist facilities.
As observed form the first picture before the construction. There were only palm trees North and West side. There was only open space and beach, there were no special facility.
We can see after the construction on island significant changes have been done to increase attraction for tourist. Interestingly the palm tress and plants were also there, and it is a good thing. Many facilities are there such as restaurant, Reception area, accommodation facilities, swimming facilities also in the beach. There are also separate foot path made for tourist. The foot path are connected to huts and reception, restaurant areas, while there is also a vehicle track for transportation.
In summary, after the construction the island got many facilities for tourists. No plants and tress were cut. It gives very nice natural beauty review to tourist. Furthermore, the roads also have been made for walking as well as the whole construction seems like has been made with proper planning.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 25, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'graph' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'graphs'.
Suggestion: graphs
The given two Pictorial graph compare the island before and after the...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...construction for tourist facilities. As observed form the first picture before ...
^^
Line 5, column 353, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'paths'?
Suggestion: paths
...the beach. There are also separate foot path made for tourist. The foot path are con...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, if, so, well, while, in summary, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 13.0 33.7804878049 38% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 920.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 175.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25714285714 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63713576256 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8332486582 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.594285714286 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 283.5 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 22.4926829268 58% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.6735107383 43.030603864 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 70.7692307692 112.824112599 63% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.4615384615 22.9334400587 59% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.23603664747 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.144221053219 0.215688989381 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0549657215926 0.103423049105 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0774216630166 0.0843802449381 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116667219603 0.15604864568 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0983435993609 0.0819641961636 120% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 13.2329268293 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.28 61.2550243902 95% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.3012195122 82% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.64 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.35 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 11.4329268293 52% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.9970731707 65% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.