The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main feature, and make comparisons where relevant.

Essay topics:

The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and 2010.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main feature, and make comparisons where relevant.

The pictures describe a layout of a hospital in 2007 and its development in 2010.

Overall, it is clear that the transportation had been improved a lot in three years, and the road's infrastructure was innovated, which helps citizens easier to transport.

In 2007, the city hospital was covered by the ring road. A number of bus stations were located on both sides of the hospital road, and the car park for staff and public nearby was laid on the right-hand of the hospital road, above the city road.

In 2010, a new public car park has been built next to the city hospital, on the East of the map. The three bus stop was completely demolished to make a new way for staff car park. Two roundabouts were constructed, which locates on two sides of the hospital road. All left bus stops were removed, replaced by a new bus station. The city hospital and the ring road remain unchanged.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 94, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'roads'' or 'road's'?
Suggestion: roads'; road's
... improved a lot in three years, and the roads infrastructure was innovated, which hel...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 33.7804878049 62% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 738.0 965.302439024 76% => OK
No of words: 160.0 196.424390244 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.6125 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.55655882008 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60048072479 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 86.0 106.607317073 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.5375 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 213.3 283.868780488 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 46.0549859233 43.030603864 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.0 112.824112599 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7777777778 22.9334400587 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.0 5.23603664747 0% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.21634706906 0.215688989381 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109072566818 0.103423049105 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0689572265754 0.0843802449381 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13030625339 0.15604864568 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0632825598786 0.0819641961636 77% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.2 13.2329268293 70% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 79.6 61.2550243902 130% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 10.3012195122 62% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.16 11.4140731707 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.95 8.06136585366 86% => OK
difficult_words: 25.0 40.7170731707 61% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.