The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010.
The maps of a city illustrate information of the roads that provided access to primary city hospital, with comparison of two years 2007 and 2010 maps with new development.
Overall, the basic facilities was same between city hospital and city road. However, the facilities was improved with time, improving the traffic system and separate the parking places of public and the staff cars.
The maps have shown that in 2007 city hospital connected with city rode through a road which has name, hospital road and it had bus stop on both side. Behind the east side of bus stop had car parking for staff and public, which has access from ring road. However, in 2010, the car parking allocated to staff which was for both earlier and for public developed on east side of hospital and accessable by ring road. The stop was placed on west side of hospital road and connected two both road ring road and city road. The road system was improved with help of roundabout.
To sum up this, the travelling and parking infrastructure was upgraded
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 98, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'named'.
Suggestion: named
...with city rode through a road which has name, hospital road and it had bus stop on b...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, so, as for, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 861.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 180.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.78333333333 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66284150148 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.39043231794 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 84.0 106.607317073 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.466666666667 0.547539520022 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 253.8 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.1331118488 43.030603864 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.6666666667 112.824112599 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 22.9334400587 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.33333333333 5.23603664747 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.384553917196 0.215688989381 178% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.174637868305 0.103423049105 169% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.139547590529 0.0843802449381 165% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.216481798504 0.15604864568 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.161271172988 0.0819641961636 197% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.2329268293 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.44 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.26 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.