Given pie charts compares about the type of communications used in 1962 and 1982.
Overall, there was a dramatic change in communication modes over the time frame; letter communication, which was the majour domain in 1962 was replaced by telephone in 1982.
Firstly, communication using letter was popular in 1962, which accounted for exactly half of the total comunication. In contrast telephone communication was only 35 percentage in 1962 and computer used for communication in lowest occasions with only 15 percentage.
On the other hands, 1982 witnessed an exponential growth in telephone communication with almost doubled the usage. computers also gained popularity with 30 percentage in this year but the letter usage lost its dominance and dropped to 10 percentage.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 120, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: contrast,
...ctly half of the total comunication. In contrast telephone communication was only 35 per...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 220, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'in the lowest'.
Suggestion: in the lowest
...962 and computer used for communication in lowest occasions with only 15 percentage. On ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 20, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...only 15 percentage. On the other hands, 1982 witnessed an exponential growth in ...
^^
Line 4, column 116, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Computers
...nication with almost doubled the usage. computers also gained popularity with 30 percenta...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, so, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 20.0 33.7804878049 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 657.0 965.302439024 68% => OK
No of words: 120.0 196.424390244 61% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.475 4.92477711251 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.30975091965 3.73543355544 89% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.19286313518 2.65546596893 120% => OK
Unique words: 79.0 106.607317073 74% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.658333333333 0.547539520022 120% => OK
syllable_count: 203.4 283.868780488 72% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.33902439024 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.7034647541 43.030603864 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.5 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 22.9334400587 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.1666666667 5.23603664747 194% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.205393676549 0.215688989381 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.129996150012 0.103423049105 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.136422637737 0.0843802449381 162% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.168769978433 0.15604864568 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.15125445367 0.0819641961636 185% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.2329268293 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 61.2550243902 70% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 11.4140731707 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.1 8.06136585366 113% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.