UK's most popular seaside towns, 1960.
Blackpool - 100 (thousands of visitors), Margate - 75, Bournemouth - 60, Great Yarmouth - 50, St.Ives - 25, Eastbourne - 20.
The table shows the information about how many tourists visited six most popular seaside towns in the UK in 1960.
Overall, what stands out from the table is that Blackpool was the most popular town, whereas the least number of people visited Eastbourne.
Looking at the details, regarding Blackpool, it was the number-one town, which was visited by the biggest number of tourists (100,000). The second most popular town, Margate, attracted a quarter less visitors that Blackpool, only 75,000. Ranked in third place among the most popular seaside towns was Bournemouth, with 60,000 visitors. The number of people who visited Great Yarmouth were slightly less than whose who came to Bournemouth, just 50,000. At the same time, it is twice as many as the number of tourists in St.Ives. It meant that Great Yarmouth and St.Ives were ranked fourth with 50,000 and fifth with 25,000 respectively. This was followed by Eastbourne, which was not nearly as popular as the first four towns. So it was ranked the last on the list, with just 25,000 visitors.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 194, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun visitors is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...ular town, Margate, attracted a quarter less visitors that Blackpool, only 75,000. R...
^^^^
Line 5, column 199, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'visitor'?
Suggestion: visitor
...town, Margate, attracted a quarter less visitors that Blackpool, only 75,000. Ranked in ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 521, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Ives
...as many as the number of tourists in St.Ives. It meant that Great Yarmouth and St.Iv...
^^^^
Line 5, column 563, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Ives
...es. It meant that Great Yarmouth and St.Ives were ranked fourth with 50,000 and fift...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, look, regarding, second, so, third, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 877.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 175.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01142857143 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63713576256 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43521109172 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.554285714286 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 238.5 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Interrogative: 1.0 0.114634146341 872% => Less interrogative sentences wanted.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 22.177466041 43.030603864 52% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 87.7 112.824112599 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5 22.9334400587 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.4 5.23603664747 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.252016191779 0.215688989381 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103069043902 0.103423049105 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0543086547402 0.0843802449381 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154544953812 0.15604864568 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.057042733843 0.0819641961636 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 61.2550243902 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.48 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.1 8.06136585366 88% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.