The bar graph compares three different types of telephone calls in terms of the number of minutes used in the UK over a period of time from 1995 to 2002.
Overall, it can be seen that the local fixed line was the most used telephone type during the whole period, while the mobile (all calls) was the least used type of telephone during the period by the British people.
When looking at the details, in 1995, the minutes of communication through local fixed line were just above 70 billion minutes. Between 1995 and 1999 this figure rose gradually, and in 1999 reached its peak, 90 billion minutes. However, this figure fell gradually between 200 and 2002 period. At the end of the period the figure for local fixed line came back to its beginning level 70 billion minutes.
In contrast, the figure for national and international fixed lines and mobile phones went up during the period. The national and international fixed lines figure saw a steady increase thorough out the period . By the end of the period it touched 60 billion minutes comparing to the below 40 billion in 1995. An increase by 20 billion minutes. Similarly, the mobile calls also shows a upward trend, but more faster than the former. The minutes of calls via mobile were less than 5 billion in 1995. However, this figure went up gradually till 1999 , from there its rocketed, and in 2002 it touched almost 45 billion minutes, a nine fold increase comparing to the initial figure.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 15, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The bar graph compares three different types of telep...
^^
Line 1, column 50, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...graph compares three different types of telephone calls in terms of the number o...
^^
Line 1, column 124, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...number of minutes used in the UK over a period of time from 1995 to 2002. Overall, it can be...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 383, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ed line came back to its beginning level 70 billion minutes. In contrast, the ...
^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s beginning level 70 billion minutes. In contrast, the figure for national and...
^^
Line 4, column 209, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... steady increase thorough out the period . By the end of the period it touched 60 ...
^^
Line 4, column 384, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
... Similarly, the mobile calls also shows a upward trend, but more faster than the ...
^
Line 4, column 404, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'faster' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: faster
...le calls also shows a upward trend, but more faster than the former. The minutes of calls v...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 547, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... this figure went up gradually till 1999 , from there its rocketed, and in 2002 it...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, look, similarly, so, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1197.0 965.302439024 124% => OK
No of words: 254.0 196.424390244 129% => OK
Chars per words: 4.7125984252 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99216450694 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.32854114884 2.65546596893 88% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 106.607317073 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.547539520022 91% => OK
syllable_count: 364.5 283.868780488 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.114634146341 872% => Less interrogative sentences wanted.
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.7244218545 43.030603864 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.0769230769 112.824112599 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5384615385 22.9334400587 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.84615384615 5.23603664747 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 1.69756097561 530% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.190424864425 0.215688989381 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.073591395233 0.103423049105 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0871121258344 0.0843802449381 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152465207796 0.15604864568 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.10428202415 0.0819641961636 127% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 13.2329268293 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.04 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.0 8.06136585366 87% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.