You should spend about 20 minutes on this task.
The charts below give information about the way in which water was used in different countries in 2000.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
You should write at least 150 words.
The coloured diagrams illustrate the water usage of the world and a selected few countries, Canada, New Zealand, India and China, in 2000 respectively by a pie chart and a horizontal bar graph for agriculture usage and domestic and industrial purpose.
The colour orange marked the usage of water in agriculture where red and green consequently marked the percantage domestic and industrial consumption of water.
It appeared 70% of the the world's water is utilized for crop production; among which, India consumed the most (92%) and China came second (69%). Canada employed the least amount of water, only 8%, for farming.
Domestic work merely needed 8% of the water. New Zealand utilized the most watre or this purpose, 46%. Canda stood second in expensing water (12%). However, both India and China used less than 15% of water combined.
Industries around the globe waste 22% of the water resources where Canda became the first monopolizer by utilizing 80% of the water for industrial purposed and India came last in the case with only 3% uasge.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 20, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
...umption of water. It appeared 70% of the the worlds water is utilized for crop produ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 20, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
...umption of water. It appeared 70% of the the worlds water is utilized for crop produ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, however, second, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 18.0 33.7804878049 53% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 882.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 174.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06896551724 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63192868298 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56177475969 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.603448275862 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 270.0 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 73.1499390311 43.030603864 170% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.0 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3333333333 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.44444444444 5.23603664747 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.104118742805 0.215688989381 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0467434237613 0.103423049105 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0126754458632 0.0843802449381 15% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0621135384224 0.15604864568 40% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0114542868868 0.0819641961636 14% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 61.2550243902 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.66 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.