You should spend about 20 minutes on this task.
The graph below shows the amounts of waste produced by three companies over a period of 15 years.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The line graph illustrates the production of industrial waste by three different companies (A, B and C) from year 2000 to 2015. Units are measured in tonnes.
Overall, total amount of waste produced by companies A and B decreased whereas, for company C waste production increased over the time given. Although company A was the significant contributor at the beginning of the period, company C took over eventually at the end.
Given closer look to the given data, company A started at the highest peak of 12 tonnes of waste making at 2000, which was steadily dipping down over the subsequent years and finally came down below company C and reached to 8 tonnes in final year. On the other hand, company C was the lest contributor of waste in three companies and was just 4 tonnes at the beginning of the period but gradually started increasing and ultimately rose to 10 tonnes in 2015.
In regard to company B, it was in middle position of just below 9 tonnes at first. This figure showed upwards trend and reached to around 10 in the year of 2005. After that year, it sharply decreased and finally reached to the number of only 3 tonnes in 2015.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...o the number of only 3 tonnes in 2015.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, if, look, whereas, in regard to, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 957.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 205.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.66829268293 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78388967377 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56260575296 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.521951219512 0.547539520022 95% => OK
syllable_count: 284.4 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.4620524311 43.030603864 147% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.333333333 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7777777778 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.88888888889 5.23603664747 151% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.207033616839 0.215688989381 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0921995155196 0.103423049105 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0521854840941 0.0843802449381 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137861494829 0.15604864568 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0285222648642 0.0819641961636 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.1 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.81 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.