You should spend about 20 minutes on this task.
The table below shows social and economic indicators for four countries in 1994, according to United Nations statistics.
Describe the information shown below in your own words. What implications do the indicators have for the countries?
You should write at least 150 words.
The table illustrates the statistical report of the United Nations regarding social and economical determinants for four different Nations of the world namely Canada, Japan, Peru, and Zaire in 1994.
Overall, all four socio-economic indicators were much higher for the developed nations like Canada and Japan whereas for developing and underdeveloped countries like Peru and Zaire had such indicators much lower. There was a strong correlation of these indicators among each other as one significantly influenced the others in the period given.
Given a close look at the data, the two developed economies (Canada and Japan) showed the highest annual income per person (in $ US 11,100 and 15, 760 respectively). Likewise, they represented similar findings of life expectancy at birth (Japan is ahead of just 2%), and the exact rate of adult literacy of 99%. However, the variation of per day caloric intake per person was around 500 calories for Canada in comparison to Japan.
On the other hand, Zaire and Peru had the lowest per capita income of US $130 and US $160 and this gross earning had a direct impact on all other indicators. Though their daily calorie intake showed a few variations of 200 calories, life expectancy (47% and 51%), and adult literacy rate (34% and 68%) had profoundly compromised.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 341, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nfluenced the others in the period given Given a close look at the data the two d...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 123, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... the highest annual income per person in US 11100 and 15 760 respectively Likewis...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, likewise, look, regarding, so, whereas, as for, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 6.8 206% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1064.0 965.302439024 110% => OK
No of words: 213.0 196.424390244 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.99530516432 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82027741392 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74755004993 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 124.0 106.607317073 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.582159624413 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 347.4 283.868780488 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 8.94146341463 11% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 213.0 22.4926829268 947% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 43.030603864 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 1064.0 112.824112599 943% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 213.0 22.9334400587 929% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 78.0 5.23603664747 1490% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.147812322484 0.215688989381 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.147812322484 0.103423049105 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0843802449381 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104995625888 0.15604864568 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.077017416681 0.0819641961636 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 108.6 13.2329268293 821% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -144.72 61.2550243902 -236% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 6.51609756098 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 86.4 10.3012195122 839% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 13.2 11.4140731707 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 18.28 8.06136585366 227% => Dale chall readability score is high.
difficult_words: 55.0 40.7170731707 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 66.0 11.4329268293 577% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 87.2 10.9970731707 793% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 87.0 11.0658536585 786% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.