You should spend about 20 minutes on this task
The chart below shows the amount of money per week spent on fast foods in
Britain. The graph shows the trends in consumption of fast foods.
Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below.
You should write at least 150 words.
The bar chart illustrates money proportion that Britain people spent to buy fast food per week on three incomes groups. While the line graph shows fast foods consumption in grams in Britain between 1970s to 1990s.
To begin with, it is noticeable that Fish and Chips are the most expensive in the low-income group almost about 20 percent, both average income group and the high-income group were spending most in hamburgers at nearly 35 percent and above 40 percent. The expenditure of pizza was much lower compared to hamburgers and Fish and Chips, which reached a peak point in the high group income almost 20 percent per person, while it had a lower percentage in average income group and low-income, at under 15 percent.
The line graphs, between the 1970s and 1990s, the most consumption of fast food was Fish and Chips at the beginning of the period at 300 grams, but they dropped about a hundred. At the same time, the hamburgers consumption was much lower in the 1970s by 100 grams then it slumped sharply to more than 500 grams at the end of the period.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 121, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... food per week on three incomes groups. While the line graph shows fast foods consump...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 153, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'foods'' or 'food's'?
Suggestion: foods'; food's
...groups. While the line graph shows fast foods consumption in grams in Britain between...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 201, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'hamburgers'' or 'hamburger's'?
Suggestion: hamburgers'; hamburger's
... about a hundred. At the same time, the hamburgers consumption was much lower in the 1970s...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, so, then, while, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 885.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 188.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.70744680851 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70287850203 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.41573117915 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.553191489362 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 246.6 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 22.4926829268 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 61.4394462504 43.030603864 143% => OK
Chars per sentence: 147.5 112.824112599 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.3333333333 22.9334400587 137% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.83333333333 5.23603664747 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.143109235848 0.215688989381 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0964150633781 0.103423049105 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.079248449798 0.0843802449381 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126072032565 0.15604864568 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.106446774 0.0819641961636 130% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.2329268293 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.39 61.2550243902 107% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.8 10.3012195122 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.63 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.69 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.9970731707 131% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.