blob:https://web.whatsapp.com/e59405e1-8f8e-437a-a69a-ed50f30d0337
The charts below show household spending patterns in two countries between 1980 and 2008.
A breakdown of the percentage of household spending patterns in two different nations between 1980 and 2008 is presented in the diagram.
Between 1980 and 2008, UK’s leisure showed a slightly decrease as similarly as food and drink in New Zealand but it was still notable as the highest of others. But food and drink in UK decreased more significant than others. In other hand, there was a less decline of the percentage New Zealand’s leisure and transport in both countries over those periods.
By contrast, there had been a slight incline in utility exactly in the percentage of UK from 26 to just over a quarter. Whereas New Zealand’s utility had showed an increase sharply to just over a third. In the other hand, others in both countries had remained reasonably steady between two years.
Overall, Although, UK’ leisure and New Zealand’s food and drink showed a decline as the same as some others, but the total percentage of households showed that both of them remained dominance as the highest of others. In other side, during those period saw a steady remain in others in both nations. While, there had been a good marked growth in both countries’ utility
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 49, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('slightly') instead an adjective, or a noun ('decrease') instead of another adjective.
...1980 and 2008, UK's leisure showed a slightly decrease as similarly as food and drink in New Z...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 385, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d growth in both countries' utility
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, similarly, so, still, third, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.48453608247 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 4.92783505155 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 5.05154639175 198% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.03092783505 33% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 32.9175257732 15% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 26.3917525773 125% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.85567010309 26% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1012.0 937.175257732 108% => OK
No of words: 200.0 206.0 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06 4.54256449028 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76060309309 3.78020617076 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82718499572 2.54303337028 111% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 127.690721649 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.622605031667 80% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 301.5 290.88556701 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.41237113402 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 9.13402061856 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 0.824742268041 121% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.83505154639 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.463917525773 431% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 1.44329896907 416% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6804123711 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 16.3608247423 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 47.3844911337 44.8134815571 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.2 76.5299724578 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 16.8248392259 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.2 4.34317383033 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 2.54639175258 79% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 7.41237113402 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.49484536082 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.94845360825 101% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.133904684287 0.216113520407 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0643358345743 0.0766984524023 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0792911040308 0.0603063233224 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118041282242 0.12726935374 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.090189200412 0.0580467560999 155% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 8.37731958763 148% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 70.7449484536 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 3.82989690722 230% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 7.45979381443 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 8.71597938144 138% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.58 7.59969072165 113% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 41.2886597938 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 8.62886597938 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 8.54432989691 117% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 8.15463917526 123% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.