The chart below shows the value of one country's exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016. The table shows the percentage change in each category or exports in 2016 compared with 2015.
The bar chart and table demonstrate export earnings in a nation and their changing rates between 2015 and 2016, divided into 5 categories namely Petroleum products, Engineered goods, Gems and jewelry, Agricultural products, and Textiles.
The first prominent feature is that export earnings in most industries experienced an upward trend over the years except for Gems and jewelry. In addition, Petroleum products registered the highest figures while Textiles accounted for the least sizeable numbers.
In particular, there were about 70 billion dollars made from exporting engineered items in 2015. This number in the latter year rose to 62 billion dollars. However, this tendency wasn't in common with those data in the Gems and jewelry area. Specifically, a subtle reduction can be observed which was from 43 billion dollars to 41 billion dollars.
On the other hand, it can be illustrated from the table that Agricultural products witnessed an incredibly slight improvement which was only 0.81% in 2016. In contrast, the rest of the group apart from Gems and jewelry achieved export revenues at much faster speeds, which were all above 3%. In spite of its humble value in billion dollars in relation to other areas, Textiles saw the most outstanding change in the analyzed period which was 15.24%.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 180, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wasn't
...billion dollars. However, this tendency wasnt in common with those data in the Gems a...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 325, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a billion'.
Suggestion: a billion
...ove 3%. In spite of its humble value in billion dollars in relation to other areas, Tex...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, while, apart from, except for, in addition, in contrast, in particular, in spite of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.48453608247 107% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 4.92783505155 41% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 5.05154639175 158% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.03092783505 198% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 32.9175257732 24% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 26.3917525773 117% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.85567010309 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1102.0 937.175257732 118% => OK
No of words: 208.0 206.0 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.29807692308 4.54256449028 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79765784423 3.78020617076 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64936564362 2.54303337028 104% => OK
Unique words: 134.0 127.690721649 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.644230769231 0.622605031667 103% => OK
syllable_count: 321.3 290.88556701 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.41237113402 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.13402061856 33% => OK
Article: 4.0 0.824742268041 485% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.83505154639 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.463917525773 216% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 1.44329896907 346% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6804123711 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 16.3608247423 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 47.0739843226 44.8134815571 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.2 76.5299724578 144% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8 16.8248392259 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.2 4.34317383033 281% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 2.54639175258 79% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 7.41237113402 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.49484536082 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.94845360825 152% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.162745297835 0.216113520407 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0565886821434 0.0766984524023 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0669384977244 0.0603063233224 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101347082405 0.12726935374 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.077108021012 0.0580467560999 133% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 8.37731958763 166% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 70.7449484536 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 3.82989690722 230% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 7.45979381443 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.46 8.71597938144 154% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.18 7.59969072165 121% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 41.2886597938 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 8.62886597938 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 8.54432989691 117% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 8.15463917526 123% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.