The charts delineate the demanders of two distinctive meals ( fast food and sit down restaurant dish) as indicated in dotted and solid lines in per year while, other information deals with the expenditure of product budgets in a family which was expended on eatery meals from 1970 to 2000.
Now, turning to the detail we can comprehend that in 1970 both indicators were in small minorities followed by starting their
consumption uplifted on swanky eatery foods around 35% opposite fast food reached a little soar just around 25%. Nevertheless, the tedious acclivity of restaurant meals could not hold its first stage which was taken by next type of meal with hurried rocketing till 2000 year.
Another chart, it should be taken into account that the fans of home cooked meals were higher in 1970 comparison with the following year the eating in restaurant leaped their budget somewhere in the vicinity of 15%. In a third of demanders chose feasting in outside in 1990 which continued to reach its peak with the half of people.
In general, the vast majority of foods were bought by restaurant while home cooked meals declined year by year until its half.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 60, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e the demanders of two distinctive meals fast food and sit down restaurant dish a...
^^
Line 4, column 247, Rule ID: AFFORD_VBG[1]
Message: This verb is used with infinitive: 'to feast'.
Suggestion: to feast
...y of 15%. In a third of demanders chose feasting in outside in 1990 which continued to r...
^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... declined year by year until its half.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, nevertheless, so, third, while, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.48453608247 80% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 4.92783505155 61% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 5.05154639175 40% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.03092783505 165% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 32.9175257732 27% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 26.3917525773 163% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.85567010309 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 963.0 937.175257732 103% => OK
No of words: 196.0 206.0 95% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91326530612 4.54256449028 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74165738677 3.78020617076 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46535236982 2.54303337028 97% => OK
Unique words: 125.0 127.690721649 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.637755102041 0.622605031667 102% => OK
syllable_count: 279.9 290.88556701 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.41237113402 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 9.13402061856 11% => OK
Article: 3.0 0.824742268041 364% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.83505154639 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.463917525773 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 1.44329896907 139% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 12.6804123711 47% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 16.3608247423 196% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 61.6263381644 44.8134815571 138% => OK
Chars per sentence: 160.5 76.5299724578 210% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 32.6666666667 16.8248392259 194% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.83333333333 4.34317383033 203% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.29896907216 116% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 2.54639175258 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 7.41237113402 40% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.49484536082 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.94845360825 76% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.233624361057 0.216113520407 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.116413221834 0.0766984524023 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.067079448509 0.0603063233224 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12838029752 0.12726935374 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0768944734856 0.0580467560999 132% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.0 8.37731958763 215% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.92 70.7449484536 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 3.82989690722 230% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 7.45979381443 180% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.79 8.71597938144 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.77 7.59969072165 115% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 41.2886597938 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 8.62886597938 220% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 14.8 8.54432989691 173% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 8.15463917526 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.