The charts below show the results of a survey of adult education The first chart shows the reasons why adults decide to study The pie chart shows how people think the costs of adult education should be shared Write a report for a university lecturer descr

Essay topics:

The charts below show the results of a survey of adult education. The first chart shows the reasons why adults decide to study. The pie chart shows how people think the costs of adult education should be shared.

Write a report for a university lecturer, describing the information shown below.

The charts below illustrates the survey outcome of adult education. The bar chart depicts the reasons why adults decide to study. The pie chart demonstrates how people think the costs of adult education should be shared.

There are 40% who responded that they likely to study because of their interest in subject followed by 38% who wanted to gain qualifications after the completion of their study. There is a common denominator among those people who said that they will study because of enjoyment and to improve prospects of promotion both of them with 20%. While there is only 9% who wants to gain new friends during their studies.

The respondents thinks that the person will undergo studies should be the one to pay atleast 40% of the course fee while 35% from the company and the rest will come from the taxpayer.

In conclusion, interest in subject and to gain qualifications are the main reasons why a person decides to undergo further education. The sharing of the course fee is divided into three which the individual has majority share.

Votes
Average: 8.2 (2 votes)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 132, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...the reasons why adults decide to study. The pie chart demonstrates how people think...
^^^
Line 3, column 340, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...cts of promotion both of them with 20%. While there is only 9% who wants to gain new ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 17, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[1]
Message: You should probably use 'think'.
Suggestion: think
...uring their studies. The respondents thinks that the person will undergo studies sh...
^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, while, in conclusion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.48453608247 94% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 4.92783505155 101% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 5.05154639175 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.03092783505 264% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 10.0 32.9175257732 30% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 26.3917525773 110% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.85567010309 156% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 879.0 937.175257732 94% => OK
No of words: 179.0 206.0 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.91061452514 4.54256449028 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65774358864 3.78020617076 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54305946887 2.54303337028 100% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 127.690721649 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.581005586592 0.622605031667 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 261.9 290.88556701 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.41237113402 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 9.13402061856 0% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.360824742268 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 0.824742268041 606% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.83505154639 54% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.463917525773 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 1.44329896907 69% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 12.6804123711 71% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 16.3608247423 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.7912601505 44.8134815571 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.6666666667 76.5299724578 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8888888889 16.8248392259 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.11111111111 4.34317383033 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 2.54639175258 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 7.41237113402 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.49484536082 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.94845360825 51% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.271516307996 0.216113520407 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.148404214039 0.0766984524023 193% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.177714523919 0.0603063233224 295% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.185949776219 0.12726935374 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.253610064939 0.0580467560999 437% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 8.37731958763 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 70.7449484536 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 3.82989690722 230% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 7.45979381443 127% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 8.71597938144 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.75 7.59969072165 102% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 41.2886597938 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 8.62886597938 99% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 8.54432989691 112% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 8.15463917526 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.