Percentage of UK people who consumed daily recommended amount of fruit and vegetable in 2002, 2006 and 2010.
The given bar chart represents the proportions of populations, segregated as men, women, and children, who had a balanced diet with sufficient amounts of fruits and vegetables during three different years - 2002, 2006, and 2010.
It clearly stands out that the trend of consumption has been the same for all the three years, where an increase was reported from 2002 to 2006, to be followed by a decline in the year 2010 for all the three demographics.
While the men reported a 4 point increase in healthy food intake from 2002 (22%) to 2006 (26%), the women and children seemed to have had a slightly higher climb with 7 percentage points, where the rise for the former was 25% to 32% and the proportions of the latter were 11% to 18%. And coming to 2010, although its overall percentages are higher than that of 2002, they are lower compared to what was reported in 2006, with the number of men and children who took a healthy diet falling at the same rate of 2 percentage points, ending up at 24% and 16% respectively. and the women's healthy intake dropping even further by 6 points.
During all three years, the female population stood high at consuming recommended foods, and falling second to them is the male demographic leaving the children to be the ones with the least healthy consumption throughout.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 566, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: And
... ending up at 24% and 16% respectively. and the womens healthy intake dropping even...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, second, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.48453608247 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 4.92783505155 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 5.05154639175 198% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.03092783505 198% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 32.9175257732 18% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 26.3917525773 136% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.85567010309 78% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1086.0 937.175257732 116% => OK
No of words: 229.0 206.0 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.7423580786 4.54256449028 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89008302616 3.78020617076 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62503578155 2.54303337028 103% => OK
Unique words: 134.0 127.690721649 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.585152838428 0.622605031667 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 297.0 290.88556701 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.41237113402 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 9.13402061856 22% => OK
Article: 3.0 0.824742268041 364% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.83505154639 109% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 0.463917525773 1078% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 1.44329896907 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 12.6804123711 47% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 38.0 16.3608247423 232% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 72.9169999992 44.8134815571 163% => OK
Chars per sentence: 181.0 76.5299724578 237% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 38.1666666667 16.8248392259 227% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 2.83333333333 4.34317383033 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 2.54639175258 39% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 7.41237113402 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.49484536082 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.94845360825 25% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.218408470905 0.216113520407 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101755256344 0.0766984524023 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0773686578686 0.0603063233224 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128143595182 0.12726935374 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.071127447867 0.0580467560999 123% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.0 8.37731958763 239% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.29 70.7449484536 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 3.82989690722 230% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 7.45979381443 196% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.8 8.71597938144 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.42 7.59969072165 111% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 41.2886597938 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 8.62886597938 209% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 17.2 8.54432989691 201% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 18.0 8.15463917526 221% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.