The prediction that people living in the 21st century will have more free time because of the improvement in technology has come true. Do you agree or disagree?
Nowadays, due to advancement in technology, many tasks those used to take hours or days can be accomplished in few minutes. Owing to this, many people believe that leisure time of people would increase dramatically, whereas, others believe that these developments will not impact people’s free time. I am more inclined to the latter one, due to the reasons mentioned in the following essay.
On the one hand, technological developments have impacted every aspect of our life. Now, we are able to complete tasks very quickly. For instance, earlier the communication used to happen over letters and it would take days or months to reach these letters to their destined person. But these days, using e-mails, messages can be sent within few seconds. This example clearly states that we are taking less time to finish the same task.
On the other hand, people these days are materialistic. They want as many luxury as they can and in this race of getting more and more, they are working hard, making their lives busier and stressful. In India for instance, mostly both spouse in a family are working to fulfil their rising necessities. Hence, they are getting less free time to spend with each other or their family. Apparently, it can be seen, even though the time to execute tasks has reduced, people in the modern world, are not getting enough time to relax.
In conclusion, after looking at both sides, it can be deduced, that even after the technological advancements, men and women are not getting enough leisure time, in present era. I have firm belief, if the trend would continue, it would surely affect the social and personal life of all, leading to psychological issues in people such as depression and loneliness.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, but, hence, if, look, second, so, whereas, for instance, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.48453608247 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 4.92783505155 203% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 11.0 5.05154639175 218% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.03092783505 132% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 32.9175257732 88% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 26.3917525773 140% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.85567010309 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1447.0 937.175257732 154% => OK
No of words: 292.0 206.0 142% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.95547945205 4.54256449028 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 3.78020617076 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6421915358 2.54303337028 104% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 127.690721649 132% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.575342465753 0.622605031667 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 457.2 290.88556701 157% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.41237113402 113% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.13402061856 120% => OK
Article: 0.0 0.824742268041 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.83505154639 163% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.463917525773 216% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 1.44329896907 485% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 12.6804123711 118% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 16.3608247423 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.7586118343 44.8134815571 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.4666666667 76.5299724578 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4666666667 16.8248392259 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.33333333333 4.34317383033 169% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 2.54639175258 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 7.41237113402 94% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.49484536082 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.94845360825 127% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.152335318524 0.216113520407 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0474875027921 0.0766984524023 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0456062091109 0.0603063233224 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.092101882244 0.12726935374 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0351916320918 0.0580467560999 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 8.37731958763 140% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 70.7449484536 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 3.82989690722 230% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 7.45979381443 143% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 8.71597938144 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.26 7.59969072165 109% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 41.2886597938 165% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 8.62886597938 99% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 8.54432989691 112% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 8.15463917526 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 87.0786516854 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.75 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.