TPO 39 - Integrated Writing Task
Base on given materials, both article and lecturer discuss problems of mass-extinction. The author says that all phenomenon that causes this problem. There are several pieces of evidence suggest that mass- extinction occurred base on three reasons, the lecturer thinks none of the evidence are clear and reject then.
Initially the author says that, see level Is one of the reason that causes the mass-extinction which were happened at the end of Triassic period.
It mentions that when see level falls, as a result many habitants for ocean population destroyed. Thus, mass-extinction occur in this way. However, the lecturer explain that may be this is not a good reason, because the see level never happens quickly, It take time and it happened gradually. So this is not good reason for mass-extinction.
Secondly, the author mentioned that big climate cooling which volcanos activity is the reason. At the end of Triassic period, volcanoes produced large amount of so2 that made the temperature lower, yet again the speaker underscores that, even if so2 was produced, it could go away by the time, in addition to that so2 can be combine with water and produce rain which means so2 won’t stay long. That’s why she doesn’t agrees with that reason.
The final point of contention between the reading and listening passage is the concept called asteroid which blocked the sunshine long enough for most plant die. On the other hand, speaker explains that asteroid happened million years before mass-extinction. Thus, professor totally oppose with this idea to.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 256, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'takes'?
Suggestion: takes
...the see level never happens quickly, It take time and it happened gradually. So this...
^^^^
Line 4, column 417, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[4]
Message: The verb 'doesn't' requires base form of this verb: 'agree'
Suggestion: agree
...won’t stay long. That’s why she doesn’t agrees with that reason. The final point of c...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 221, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a million'.
Suggestion: a million
...speaker explains that asteroid happened million years before mass-extinction. Thus, pro...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, may, second, secondly, so, then, thus, in addition, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.48453608247 147% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 4.92783505155 61% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 5.05154639175 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 19.0 3.03092783505 627% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 24.0 32.9175257732 73% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 26.3917525773 83% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 3.85567010309 285% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1317.0 937.175257732 141% => OK
No of words: 254.0 206.0 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18503937008 4.54256449028 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99216450694 3.78020617076 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71450626028 2.54303337028 107% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 127.690721649 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.625984251969 0.622605031667 101% => OK
syllable_count: 389.7 290.88556701 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.41237113402 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.13402061856 44% => OK
Article: 5.0 0.824742268041 606% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 1.83505154639 163% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.463917525773 216% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 1.44329896907 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6804123711 110% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 16.3608247423 110% => OK
Sentence length SD: 67.8914574891 44.8134815571 151% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.0714285714 76.5299724578 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1428571429 16.8248392259 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.78571428571 4.34317383033 156% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.29896907216 116% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 2.54639175258 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 7.41237113402 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 1.49484536082 535% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.94845360825 101% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.216113520407 0% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0766984524023 0% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0603063233224 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.12726935374 0% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0580467560999 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 8.37731958763 144% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 70.7449484536 87% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 3.82989690722 81% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 7.45979381443 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 8.71597938144 144% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.38 7.59969072165 110% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 41.2886597938 150% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 8.62886597938 81% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 8.54432989691 108% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 8.15463917526 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.