tpo 49 integrated writing
Base on Reading and listening, humpback navigate with the use of stars, which mention in Reading, but it has a high contradiction with the lecture.
First of all, The writer believes that starts are used by humpback whales to navigate. However, the professor states many animals are using this ability to browse, such as dock with very average intelligence. As a result, it does not mean that humpbacks are intelligence. That's why the professor disagrees with the idea.
Secondly, the reading passage argues that strait line has been a way to go to a direction for log distance if they orient themselves by some objects or forces. However, the lecturer does not agree with it. She refutes it with a logic description. She says humpback has a biomagnetic facility in its brain and body, which is very sensitive, which can help it to find its way rather than starts. It does not have any relation to being intelligent.
Thirdly, the author estimates that such a complicated behavior is shown by whales, which is their head above water as they are looking upward. However, the professor states that this is not the correct fact to say that spy-hopping is only for humpback, but also other animals like a shark do that for hunting. So this isn't a good reason because this behavior use by sharks even in the day which no stars appear.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 272, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: That's
...t mean that humpbacks are intelligence. Thats why the professor disagrees with the id...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 350, Rule ID: HELP_TO_FIND[1]
Message: This phrase is probably grammatically incorrect. Write 'help it find' instead.
Suggestion: help it find
...ody, which is very sensitive, which can help it to find its way rather than starts. It does not...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 319, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: isn't
...ke a shark do that for hunting. So this isnt a good reason because this behavior use...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, look, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, such as, as a result, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.48453608247 147% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 4.92783505155 20% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 5.05154639175 99% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 3.03092783505 396% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 25.0 32.9175257732 76% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 26.3917525773 95% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.85567010309 207% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1101.0 937.175257732 117% => OK
No of words: 232.0 206.0 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.74568965517 4.54256449028 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90276135726 3.78020617076 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59873045356 2.54303337028 102% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 127.690721649 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.60775862069 0.622605031667 98% => OK
syllable_count: 342.0 290.88556701 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.41237113402 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.13402061856 44% => OK
Article: 6.0 0.824742268041 728% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.83505154639 54% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.463917525773 431% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 0.0 1.44329896907 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6804123711 103% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 16.3608247423 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.1793519268 44.8134815571 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.6923076923 76.5299724578 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8461538462 16.8248392259 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.38461538462 4.34317383033 193% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 2.54639175258 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 7.41237113402 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 1.49484536082 334% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.94845360825 76% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.216113520407 0% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0766984524023 0% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0603063233224 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.12726935374 0% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0580467560999 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 8.37731958763 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 70.7449484536 89% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 3.82989690722 81% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 7.45979381443 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.97 8.71597938144 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.09 7.59969072165 106% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 41.2886597938 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 8.62886597938 93% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 8.54432989691 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 8.15463917526 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.