Visitors who visit other countries should follow the local customs and behaviours or the host country should welcome the cultural diversity and allow visitors’ own custom and behaviours.
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Every place has its own culture and it is sometimes thought that the tourists should adopt the traditions of the country they visit. However, others believe that the natives should show tolerance towards the diversity in culture, which results from foreigners visiting their country. In my opinion, I agree with the latter view and strongly opine that travelers are guests to their city and welcoming their cultural values is in their benefit.
To begin with, people travel to other countries to explore the place and their trip can be successful only if they do not have any compulsion of knowing or behaving as per the new culture. Admittedly, tourists would not show interest in visiting a place where they need to learn their culture or behave according to their values. For example, if I have to learn German before going to Germany then I would never go there; instead, I would think to visit some other place. thus, tourists should not be bothered to adapt to any cultural aspects.
Another reason for not imposing any cultural rules on tourists is because they bring a myriad of wealth to the country. This helps the host country to raise employment opportunities and boost their economy. As a result, it is advisable that the host country does not trouble the tourist in following their local customs and make their travel simple.
On the contrary, the critics argue that by allowing the foreigners to follow their culture, ruins the culture of the host country. The travelers bring their way of living to their country and gradually their original values diminish with time. Therefore, cultural variations should not be tolerated at any cost.
In conclusion, I pen down saying that despite some drawbacks of inviting various culture in the host country, the benefits of being liber towards tourists' culture are many. thus, the hosting country should be liberal to allow the cultural aspects of tourists in their country.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 473, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Thus
... would think to visit some other place. thus, tourists should not be bothered to ada...
^^^^
Line 5, column 352, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...l customs and make their travel simple. On the contrary, the critics argue that ...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 175, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Thus
...ber towards tourists culture are many. thus, the hosting country should be liberal ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, then, therefore, thus, for example, in conclusion, as a result, in my opinion, on the contrary, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.48453608247 147% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 4.92783505155 203% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 9.0 5.05154639175 178% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.03092783505 264% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 35.0 32.9175257732 106% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 26.3917525773 163% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.85567010309 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1624.0 937.175257732 173% => OK
No of words: 323.0 206.0 157% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.02786377709 4.54256449028 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23936324884 3.78020617076 112% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43721494292 2.54303337028 96% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 127.690721649 135% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.532507739938 0.622605031667 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 490.5 290.88556701 169% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.41237113402 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.13402061856 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 0.824742268041 485% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.83505154639 109% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.463917525773 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 1.44329896907 277% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 12.6804123711 118% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 16.3608247423 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 33.8641731365 44.8134815571 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.266666667 76.5299724578 141% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5333333333 16.8248392259 128% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.4 4.34317383033 193% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.29896907216 116% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 2.54639175258 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 7.41237113402 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.49484536082 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.94845360825 51% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.236271131743 0.216113520407 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0996828595529 0.0766984524023 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.051105348303 0.0603063233224 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151296989609 0.12726935374 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0283356612235 0.0580467560999 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 8.37731958763 155% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 70.7449484536 83% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 3.82989690722 81% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 7.45979381443 138% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 8.71597938144 136% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.49 7.59969072165 112% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 41.2886597938 189% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 8.62886597938 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 8.54432989691 122% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 8.15463917526 159% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.