15. The key to solving environmental problem is simple: present generation are willing to accept a less comfortable life for the sake of the future generation. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It has been discussed for decades about how to tackle the environmental problem on our planet. Some people argued that human beings can simply live with lower standards to give the next generations a better future. I strongly disagree with this point of view. I do not think many people would like to have a lifestyle which worse than what they have had, and even though some of them want to make a change, the problem cannot be solved without actions from governments.
To begin with, many people are not willing to have a less comfortable life. People, especially residents from developing countries, are actually unsatisfied with their current living conditions. For instance, most of the young people in China still need to work extremely hard to buy a house, to have a car and to lead a better life. Those who are working for a living still need to consume more daily necessities like food and clothes. They are damaging the environment rather than saving the earth.
To consider another side, some of the people concern about the environment and want to sacrifice for their children or grandchildren. Normally, they think about others can care about global problems because they have had what they need. However, even though people like them would like to try, it’s not easy to change due to the limited influence. instead, only if all the governments in the world work together can the environmental problem be solved.
In conclusion, it is unrealistic to deal with the environmental problem by sacrificing a comfortable life. Millions of people would not do that, and it will not have a significant effect. I believe governments can do more in these problems.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 27, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...he earth. To consider another side, some of the people concern about the environment an...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 349, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Instead
...to change due to the limited influence. instead, only if all the governments in the wor...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 454, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...an the environmental problem be solved. In conclusion, it is unrealistic to deal...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, however, if, so, still, for instance, in conclusion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1398.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 283.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.93992932862 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71470556244 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.56890459364 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 431.1 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.9229790991 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.375 106.682146367 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6875 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.75 7.06120827912 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.167908483145 0.244688304435 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0573365900908 0.084324248473 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0472727876241 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111175354874 0.151304729494 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0387569957842 0.056905535591 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.0946893788 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 50.2224549098 125% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.3001002004 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 12.4159519038 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.83 8.58950901804 91% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 78.4519038076 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.