In the contemporary life, it is hard to evaluate someone by their characteristics only without factors like social status and material possessions. There are arguments that whether values like honour, kindness and trust are obsolete nowadays to be replaced by social power and finance. This essay will show my point of view and suggestions about this issue.
In terms of a person's worth has been judged based on their position and wallet, it is appropriate because these can partly reflect the process and determination for achieving goals of individuals. Societies tend to need talented people serving for them so that as much as profit will be created, which means the higher place we sit, the more valuable we are. Moreover, along with the progress we made in work can lead to the rise of salary. So it is understadable that we will possess more money and become richer, thanks to suffering from difficulties in life and our pure effort to be a better version every day.
On the other hand, it could be a mistake if we neglected behavior matter. People do pay a particular attention to how we act for making proper evaluation lately. For instance, an employee who is compassionate, grateful and humble deserves to receive reliability from his or her boss than the one who is selfish and ready to talk back at any time though they have higher social status and possessions. Besides, a good personality makes us different from animals, from hearing others' stories to sympathizing with them are kind of exquisite things forming our worth needed to be preserved rather than abandoned.
In conclusion, I assume that social status and material possessions must definitely be included in the list of judgement. But it is completely wrong to say honour, kindness and trust are no longer critical and old-fashioned as these are core values of humans that have to be maintained in any period of time.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 293, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...umans that have to be maintained in any period of time.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, if, moreover, so, for instance, in conclusion, kind of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1576.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 321.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90965732087 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23278547379 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80363793521 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.632398753894 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 502.2 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.0422406195 49.4020404114 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.230769231 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6923076923 20.7667163134 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.69230769231 7.06120827912 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.246612449441 0.244688304435 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0799803715173 0.084324248473 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0574522376009 0.0667982634062 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152767209312 0.151304729494 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0664562092711 0.056905535591 117% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.71 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.