3 These days more fathers stay at home and take care of their children while mothers go out to work What could be the reasons for this Do you think it is a positive or a negatives development

Unequivocally, dynamics of the society has changed a lot and it is for the greater good. In recent years, women were seen to be the person who usually looks after their children by staying at home while; now this position has been taken by males. This essay will not only highlight the reasons behind this trend but also why is positive development.

The human society has entered egalitarianism where everyone has equal rights and opportunities. It is the norm for women to have an option to gain necessary knowledge and pursue the carrier she likes. Simultaneously, men have the social acceptance to stay at home to be responsible for children’s growth. Apart from this reason, the living expenditure has skyrocketed which basically means that to make meet the ends both the parents have to work together in order to save money for the future of children. Once they have children, they would have to decide who take the children’s responsibility rests on the decision made by both partners. In this way, one will work to earn money to fulfill the dream of other.

This trend is completely constructive. The society is zeal and joyful, when each gender has equal rights. Setting aside a women from her carrier is morally wrong same as men. Uniformly, it is utter upright that males should have the liberty to choose whether to continue job or stay at home with childcare responsibility. Additionally, studies of WISC show that father spending with child is beneficial for the emotional and mental development of children.

To conclude, this essay has highlighted the reason behind this are living in egalitarian society and inflating in living cost and presented aspects why it is pragmatic such as women having opportunity and father spending a constructive time with children.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 121, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a woman' or simply 'women'?
Suggestion: a woman; women
... gender has equal rights. Setting aside a women from her carrier is morally wrong same ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 123, Rule ID: WOMAN_WOMEN[1]
Message: 'woman' is the singular form of 'women'. Consider using 'woman'?
Suggestion: woman
...ender has equal rights. Setting aside a women from her carrier is morally wrong same ...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, look, so, while, apart from, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1496.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 297.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.03703703704 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85861956808 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.59595959596 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 465.3 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.4089045 49.4020404114 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.7333333333 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.4 7.06120827912 48% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.253063692114 0.244688304435 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0772103969068 0.084324248473 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0632144750077 0.0667982634062 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152146988451 0.151304729494 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0531896908896 0.056905535591 93% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.0946893788 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.46 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.