the ability to the future job is related to relations
In general, the statement is one of the major considerations of people including me. Some may hold the view that making relations with others can lead a person to success in future career. I, however, after thinking about this direction on many occassions, decided to stand up in contrast with this opinion. I suppose providing following reasons to support my idea is crucial.
The first important factor which comes to mind is that in this way people are able to choose a job which they are interested in. Since these persons are well educated ones, they can reach their desired career in the future.By these words, in today society education plays unavoidable role in everyone's future life success. I think that a small example can give some light. Imagine a girl who is a high school student and she is very studious. It would seem to me that such a person who loves chemistry will be a good chemist in the future, because, she know a lot of things about labs an what chemists do.
Another significant point involved in this issue is that information is power. It is sufficiently clear that nowadays advanced societies are directly associated with technologies. Therefore, men and women should try to acquire more data in order to know how to use these technologies. I guess there is not a better example than my friend who is a computer engineer at one of the biggest companies in the country. She were very smart at school and always tried to learn new thing about computers and now she is a very professional one in her career, because she has been learned what is computer technology.
Admittedly, there are some justifications by someone who argues that ability to relate well to people lead people to achieve. From these groups view, communication is the most important reason to thrive. In contrary , still I confirm that studying hard even assists individuals relationships. For example, I know a lot of boys and girls who by participating at science communities like conferences would make a lot of useful friendships with other scholars.
In sum, from above mentioned causes, reaching the conclusion that deeper study increases the quality of people's future occupation, is marked
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 95, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'holds'.
Suggestion: holds
...ations of people including me. Some may hold the view that making relations with oth...
^^^^
Line 3, column 224, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: By
...each their desired career in the future.By these words, in today society education...
^^
Line 3, column 554, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'she' must be used with a third-person verb: 'knows'.
Suggestion: knows
...ood chemist in the future, because, she know a lot of things about labs an what chem...
^^^^
Line 3, column 586, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...se, she know a lot of things about labs an what chemists do. Another significan...
^^
Line 5, column 418, Rule ID: PERS_PRONOUN_AGREEMENT_SENT_START[5]
Message: Use third-person verb with 'She': 'is' or 'was'.
Suggestion: is; was
...e biggest companies in the country. She were very smart at school and always tried t...
^^^^
Line 7, column 216, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... important reason to thrive. In contrary , still I confirm that studying hard even...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, may, so, still, therefore, well, for example, i guess, i suppose, i think, in contrast, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 13.1623246493 167% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 16.0 7.30460921844 219% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 37.0 24.0651302605 154% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 57.0 41.998997996 136% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1832.0 1615.20841683 113% => OK
No of words: 372.0 315.596192385 118% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9247311828 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.39173103935 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79628391987 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 231.0 176.041082164 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.620967741935 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 582.3 506.74238477 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.7089527815 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.4210526316 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5789473684 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.21052631579 7.06120827912 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.109272896619 0.244688304435 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0276033589496 0.084324248473 33% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0595021449993 0.0667982634062 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0581301955036 0.151304729494 38% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0375188369054 0.056905535591 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.0946893788 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.61 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.