Action movies with spectacular car chases are very popular with young people. It is often said that these sorts of movies lead to an increase in car accidents among young drivers as they try to copy what they have seen in the films.
Do you agree that such movies increase the amount of bad driving? What can be done to encourage young people to drive more safely?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Undoubtedly, youngsters are highly fond of those action films which showcase high-speed car chase sequences such as "Fast and the Furious". While it might be true that these movies influence young minds who try to imitate such scenes in reality and cause car accidents however, I do not agree that movies are to blame for the rising number of road accidents. I would discuss it further with some steps that can be taken to motivate younger ones to drive safer.
To begin with, I disagree with this accusation on action movies because I believe that there are several other reasons making the youth drive inappropriately. First of all, almost all of them are found to be driving badly to reach their respective destinations on time, just because they did not start early. Without any doubt, driving it in a hurry can lead to drastic consequences. Another major cause of increasing mishaps on roads is the usage of cell-phones. These days, people can be easily found sticked to their phones while eating, walking, travelling in a train or bus, et cetera. Car drivers also fall under this category. It is a common thing to notice among young-adult drivers, that they are talking on their phones while driving and calling themselves the multi-taskers. The fatality of such a habit is needless to mention. One more reason that I would like to highlight here is that many parents allow their children to drive even without getting trained and licensed. Such immature drivers cause accidents which could have been easily averted.
On the other hand, motivating young drivers to drive in a harmless manner can be the key to making roads safer. In order to do this, it is necessary to make them realise the extent of damage their mistakes on roads can lead to. Not only it can put them on beds for months, disturbing their life devastatingly, but also it can put their future at stake if they are charges by the law-makers of something that might have incurred a great loss to others witnessing the same. Unless and until the youngsters understand this, they would never be careful enough to stay away from such unwanted trouble. It is necessary for them to value their lives which again needs a mature guidance. Apart from this, strictness can also lead to encouragement. If there are strict laws governing drivers on the roads with even stricter punishments like abolishment of drivers, then it would definitely make the drivers abide by it to not lose their right.
To conclude, it can be said that bad driving is caused by various reasons such as rushing somewhere in a hurry however, there are many ways which can urge young drivers to be the good ones on roads. Blaming action movies would not solve anything.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 54, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a harmless manner" with adverb for "harmless"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...hand, motivating young drivers to drive in a harmless manner can be the key to making roads safer. I...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, so, then, while, apart from, such as, first of all, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 13.1623246493 182% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 7.85571142285 229% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 51.0 24.0651302605 212% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 67.0 41.998997996 160% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2259.0 1615.20841683 140% => OK
No of words: 467.0 315.596192385 148% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.83725910064 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.64867537961 4.20363070211 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57704309038 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 246.0 176.041082164 140% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.526766595289 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 698.4 506.74238477 138% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 16.0721442886 137% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.76944867 49.4020404114 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.681818182 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2272727273 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.22727272727 7.06120827912 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 3.9879759519 276% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.224537229034 0.244688304435 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0639057161222 0.084324248473 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0518340076823 0.0667982634062 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150489538871 0.151304729494 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0529138956035 0.056905535591 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 12.4159519038 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.96 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.