Advantages and disadvantages of keeping zoos
There has been always a heated debate over the usefulness of keeping zoos. Some people are of the opinion that zoological places serve a variety of purposes including education and entertainment, while others assert that they are worthless and better to be closed due to the cruelty and disturbances they may cause. I, for one, believe that the benefits of maintaining zoos far outweigh the disadvantages.
First of all, zoos provide a sanctuary for animal species, especially those which are seriously on the verge of extinction. A wide group of animals is under the threats which have been posed by human beings. Poaching and habitat fragmentation are two examples of people’s activities which have triggered massive perturbations in ecosystem. This, consequently, has caused severe dangers, leading to the disappearance of some species like rare breeds. To protect endangered animals, zoos are established as places where trained experts are hired to provide safe environment, proper food plans, and constant surveillance.
Secondly, zoological places are beneficial for not only widening people’s knowledge but also providing entertainment. To begin with, as zoos are designed to encompass diverse animals, people of all age groups can gain valuable information by visiting those places. That is, zoo guides offer insight into the animal world with engaging stories, broad facts, and animals’ observations. Moreover, children as well as adults are able to experience an interaction with tame animals by touching and feeding them under the supervision of the keepers. In addition to knowledge, zoos offer amusements too. Local people and tourists who are interested in wild life choose these places to not only become acquainted with a variety of living beings but also benefit from the recreational facilities they offer. This includes public shows in which trained animals display funny performances.
On the other hand, a group of opponents claim that keeping animals in cages question humanity. In other words, they believe that captivating animal species is cruel, for all creatures have the right to live freely. In fact, encaging animals causes them to suffer from depression and distress due to the fact that they pace small cages back and forward all the day. Furthermore, those who advocate the abolishment of zoos opine that if animals are encased and away from their natural habitats, food chains will be disrupted. The conservation of food webs is directly dependent on the number of predators and preys in nature. In fact, if one species ceases to exist in the food chain, other species will be affected. Thus, zoos as places in which some specific categories of animals are kept can trigger irreversible changes in ecological system which may not be compensable.
In brief, although there are some negative points in maintaining zoos, I personally find the advantages more worthwhile. Protecting endangered species and providing pastime and considerable knowledge are some of the chief purposes which zoos usually aim at.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 204, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
... pastime and considerable knowledge are some of the chief purposes which zoos usually aim a...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, furthermore, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, thus, well, while, in addition, in brief, in fact, as well as, first of all, in other words, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 13.1623246493 182% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 7.30460921844 246% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 64.0 41.998997996 152% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2582.0 1615.20841683 160% => OK
No of words: 479.0 315.596192385 152% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.39039665971 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.67825486995 4.20363070211 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91479380792 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 274.0 176.041082164 156% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.572025052192 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 811.8 506.74238477 160% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 16.0721442886 149% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.6906389373 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.583333333 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9583333333 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.79166666667 7.06120827912 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.133304579012 0.244688304435 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0389554085543 0.084324248473 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0406799282562 0.0667982634062 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0786726164489 0.151304729494 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0185327274359 0.056905535591 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.98 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.16 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 139.0 78.4519038076 177% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.